Literature DB >> 2031258

Interaction between cyclosporine and fluconazole in renal allograft recipients.

D M Canafax1, N M Graves, D M Hilligoss, B C Carleton, M J Gardner, A J Matas.   

Abstract

To determine the effect of fluconazole on cyclosporine concentrations, we used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design to evaluate 16 stable renal transplant recipients receiving a constant cyclosporine dose. The two groups of patients were given identical capsules of either placebo or fluconazole 200 mg daily for 14 days. Compliance with the protocol was ensured by watching each patient take all the drug doses. Frequent whole-blood cyclosporine trough concentrations, measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and two area under the blood concentration time curves were determined before and after 14 days of fluconazole or placebo. The results show that cyclosporine trough concentrations, in patients given fluconazole, increased from a mean +/- SD of 27 +/- 16 to 58 +/- 28 ng/ml (P = 0.001) while patients given placebo did not change--35 +/- 26 vs. 37 +/- 35 ng/ml (P = 0.7). Mean cyclosporine AUC increased in the fluconazole patients from 2167 +/- 1039 to 3989 +/- 1675 ng.hr/ml (P = 0.02) while the placebo patients did not change, 3089 +/- 2439 vs. 2954 +/- 2216 ng.hr/ml (P = 0.9). The pre- and post-treatment cyclosporine AUC difference (day 16 minus day 2) for fluconazole vs. placebo was 1822 +/- 1083 vs. -134 +/- 831 ng.hr/ml (P = 0.001). Mean cyclosporine clearance decreased an average of 55% in the fluconazole patients from 1.2 +/- 0.5 to 0.7 +/- 0.4 ml/hr.kg (P = 0.03); the placebo patients did not change--1.4 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.7 +/- 2.3 ml/hr.kg (P = 0.07). During the study period, serum creatinine concentrations did not increase after fluconazole vs. placebo treatment; they were 1.4 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.3 mg% (P = 0.8) initially, and 1.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.3 mg% (P = 0.5) after 14 days. This study indicates that fluconazole 200 mg daily can slowly increase cyclosporine concentrations over two weeks of therapy, approximately doubling the cyclosporine trough concentrations. The management of this interaction requires prospective planning for adjustments in the cyclosporine dosage, guided by cyclosporine concentrations, while transplant recipients are receiving fluconazole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2031258     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199105000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  28 in total

Review 1.  Adverse drug reactions to systemic antifungals. Prevention and management.

Authors:  J R Perfect; M H Lindsay; R H Drew
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in superficial and systemic mycoses.

Authors:  D Debruyne
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Effects of the antifungal agents on oxidative drug metabolism: clinical relevance.

Authors:  K Venkatakrishnan; L L von Moltke; D J Greenblatt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Mini-series: II. clinical aspects. clinically relevant CYP450-mediated drug interactions in the ICU.

Authors:  Isabel Spriet; Wouter Meersseman; Jan de Hoon; Sandrina von Winckelmann; Alexander Wilmer; Ludo Willems
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Clinically significant drug interactions with cyclosporin. An update.

Authors:  C Campana; M B Regazzi; I Buggia; M Molinaro
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Clinical relevance of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in cardiac critical care patients.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Federica Pavan; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Fluconazole therapy in transplant recipients receiving FK506.

Authors:  R Mañez; M Martin; D Raman; D Silverman; A Jain; V Warty; I Gonzalez-Pinto; S Kusne; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1994-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Quantitative drug interactions prediction system (Q-DIPS): a dynamic computer-based method to assist in the choice of clinically relevant in vivo studies.

Authors:  P Bonnabry; J Sievering; T Leemann; P Dayer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Endemic Mycoses in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Jeremy S Nel; Luther A Bartelt; David van Duin; Anne M Lachiewicz
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 5.982

10.  Effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetic profile of buprenorphine following administration of a once-weekly buprenorphine transdermal system.

Authors:  Ram P Kapil; Alessandra Cipriano; Gregory H Michels; Peter Perrino; Sarah A O'Keefe; Manjunath S Shet; Salvatore V Colucci; Robert J Noveck; Stephen C Harris
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.