Literature DB >> 2031202

Bringing social structure back into clinical decision making.

J A Clark1, D A Potter, J B McKinlay.   

Abstract

Although research in the past twenty years has resulted in an increasingly sophisticated understanding of clinical decision making processes, the dominant approach in this area of inquiry remains limited. Most studies emphasize normative models of how decisions ought to be made, others attempt to describe physicians' thinking, but few take the social context of decision making systematically into account. Research models typically assume that physicians are autonomous professionals practicing in socially insular clinical settings--an approach that is consistent with classic formulations of the social structure of medical practice, but they ignore 30 years of sociological research on research on patient-physician relationships and major historical changes in the structure of medical practice. Eisenberg's still timely advice to students of clinical decision making--that they need to describe decision making in the context of 'sociologic influences' (including patient, physician and practice setting characteristics)--is expanded in the present discussion. Recent studies are reviewed, highlighting important dimensions of social structure impinging on physicians' decision making. Findings indicate that the process of clinical decision making is likely influenced by patients' age, gender, socioeconomic status, and race, physicians' professional training and experience, as well as by larger structural features of organized clinical settings. Our review of these studies on the social context of clinical decision making, however, reveals major methodological limitations including those inherently imposed by secondary data analysis, normative approaches, written case vignettes, small, non-random samples and the inadequate control of confounding influences. We present a feasible, alternative research strategy, built on a factorial experimental design. Illustrative findings indicate how complex social structural influence on clinical decision making may be disentangled in an unconfounded manner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2031202     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90241-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  22 in total

1.  Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in primary care. Clinical decision making is not necessarily guided by prejudice.

Authors:  R Raine
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-18

Review 2.  Competing conceptions of diagnostic reasoning--is there a way out?

Authors:  R Førde
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-01

3.  Construction and practice of medical responsibility: dilemmas and narratives from geriatrics.

Authors:  S R Kaufman
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  1997-03

Review 4.  Governance mechanisms in the physician-patient relationship: a literature review and conceptual framework.

Authors:  Gabriela Tofan; Virginia Bodolica; Martin Spraggon
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  The relationship between supply and hospitalization rates for mental illness and substance use disorders.

Authors:  M S Hendryx; M E Urdaneta; T Borders
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1995

6.  Understanding the basis of treatment choices for varicose veins: a model for decision making with the repertory grid technique.

Authors:  D Baker
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-09

7.  Effect of treatment success and empathy on surgeon attributions for back surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Raymond C Tait; John T Chibnall; Angela Luebbert; Christian Sutter
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-08

8.  A typology of practice narratives during the implementation of a preventive, community intervention trial.

Authors:  Therese Riley; Penelope Hawe
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  The role of economic evaluation in the decision-making process of family physicians: design and methods of a qualitative embedded multiple-case study.

Authors:  Chantale Lessard; André-Pierre Contandriopoulos; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Principles and practices of medicine. The co-existence of various anemias.

Authors:  A Mol; M Berg
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  1994-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.