Emma J Rose1, Thomas J Ross, Pradeep K Kurup, Elliot A Stein. 1. Neuroimaging Research Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse-Intramural Research Program, 251 Bayview Blvd. Suite 200 (NIDA), Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Nicotine influences many cognitive processes, especially those requiring high attentional loads, yet the impact of nicotine on all aspects of information processing has not been well delineated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the relative behavioral and functional effects of nicotine on dissociable aspects of information processing (i.e., selective attention and motor intention). METHODS:Adult smokers (N = 25) and healthy controls (N = 23) performed theintention/attention task (IAT) twice, during functional magnetic resonance imaging. The IAT assesses the relative differences in performance evoked by prime stimuli that provide information regarding either the correct hand with which to respond (i.e., intentional primes) or the likely location of a target stimulus (i.e., attentional primes). Smokers were scanned 2 h after nicotine (21 mg) or placebo patch placement. The order of nicotine and placebo sessions was randomized and counter-balanced. Controls were also scanned twice, with no patch placement in either session. RESULTS: While drug condition had no significant effect on reaction time, smokers were overall more accurate than controls. Moreover, nicotine significantly increased the response to intentional primes in brain regions known to mediate response readiness, e.g., inferior parietal lobe, supramarginal gyrus, and striatum. CONCLUSIONS: While limited to participant accuracy, these data suggest that the behavioral effects of nicotine in smokers are not only limited to information processing input (i.e., selective attention) but are also generalizable to output functions (i.e., motor intention). Moreover, nicotine's effects on intention appear to be mediated by a facilitation of function in brain regions associated with information processing output.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Nicotine influences many cognitive processes, especially those requiring high attentional loads, yet the impact of nicotine on all aspects of information processing has not been well delineated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the relative behavioral and functional effects of nicotine on dissociable aspects of information processing (i.e., selective attention and motor intention). METHODS: Adult smokers (N = 25) and healthy controls (N = 23) performed the intention/attention task (IAT) twice, during functional magnetic resonance imaging. The IAT assesses the relative differences in performance evoked by prime stimuli that provide information regarding either the correct hand with which to respond (i.e., intentional primes) or the likely location of a target stimulus (i.e., attentional primes). Smokers were scanned 2 h after nicotine (21 mg) or placebo patch placement. The order of nicotine and placebo sessions was randomized and counter-balanced. Controls were also scanned twice, with no patch placement in either session. RESULTS: While drug condition had no significant effect on reaction time, smokers were overall more accurate than controls. Moreover, nicotine significantly increased the response to intentional primes in brain regions known to mediate response readiness, e.g., inferior parietal lobe, supramarginal gyrus, and striatum. CONCLUSIONS: While limited to participant accuracy, these data suggest that the behavioral effects of nicotine in smokers are not only limited to information processing input (i.e., selective attention) but are also generalizable to output functions (i.e., motor intention). Moreover, nicotine's effects on intention appear to be mediated by a facilitation of function in brain regions associated with information processing output.
Authors: Adrianna Mendrek; John Monterosso; Sara L Simon; Murray Jarvik; Arthur Brody; Richard Olmstead; Catherine P Domier; Mark S Cohen; Monique Ernst; Edythe D London Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2005-07-11 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Catherine P Domier; John R Monterosso; Arthur L Brody; Sara L Simon; Adrianna Mendrek; Richard Olmstead; Murray E Jarvik; Mark S Cohen; Edythe D London Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2007-07-19 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: E D Levin; C K Conners; D Silva; S C Hinton; W H Meck; J March; J E Rose Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Brett Froeliger; Leslie A Modlin; Rachel V Kozink; Lihong Wang; Eric L Garland; Merideth A Addicott; F Joseph McClernon Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Henrique Soila Menossi; Anna E Goudriaan; Cintia de Azevedo-Marques Périco; Sérgio Nicastri; Arthur Guerra de Andrade; Gilberto D'Elia; Chiang-Shan R Li; João Mauricio Castaldelli-Maia Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 5.749