Literature DB >> 20308415

Breeding of tomorrow's chickens to improve well-being.

H-W Cheng1.   

Abstract

Chickens, as well as other animals, have the ability to change their behavior (behavioral plasticity) and physiology (physiological plasticity) based on the costs and benefits to fit their environment (adaptation). Through natural selection, the population preserves and accumulates traits that are beneficial and rejects those that are detrimental in their prevailing environments. The surviving populations are able to contribute more genes associated with beneficial traits for increased fitness to subsequent generations. Natural selection is slow but constant; working over multiple generations, the changes to the population often appear silent or undetectable at a given point in history. Chickens were domesticated from the wild red jungle fowl. The principle of domestication of chickens, as well as other farm animals, by humans is similar to that of natural selection: selecting the best animals with the highest survivability and reproducibility (artificial selection). Compared with natural selection, the process of artificial selection is motivated by human needs and acts more rapidly with more visible results over a short time period. This process has been further accelerated following the development of current breeding programs and the emergence of specialized breeding companies. A laying hen, for example, produces more than 300 hundred eggs a year, whereas a jungle fowl lays 4 to 6 eggs in a year. During the domestication process, chickens retained their capability to adapt to their housing environments, which is usually achieved by genetic changes occurring with each subsequent generation. Genes control the behavioral, physiological, immunological, and psychological responses of animals to stressors, including environmental stimulations. With advances in understanding of genetic mediation of animal physiology and behavior and the discovery of the genome sequences of many species, animal production breeding programs can be improved in both speed and efficiency. Modern chicken breeding programs have the potential to be operated successfully in the breeding of tomorrow's chickens with high production efficiency and optimal welfare, resulting from resistance to stress, disease, or both.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20308415     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2009-00361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  13 in total

Review 1.  Nutrigenomics and personalized diets: What will they mean for food?

Authors:  J Bruce German; Angela M Zivkovic; David C Dallas; Jennifer T Smilowitz
Journal:  Annu Rev Food Sci Technol       Date:  2011

2.  Genetic parameters for tonic immobility, body weight, and morphological traits of the red-winged tinamou (Rhynchotus rufescens).

Authors:  Dimas de Oliveira Santos; Francisco Ribeiro de Araujo Neto; Daniel Jordan de Abreu Santos; Fabiana Ramos Dos Santos; Rusbel Raul Aspilcueta-Borquis; Sandra Aidar de Queiroz; Humberto Tonhati
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Precision genetics for complex objectives in animal agriculture.

Authors:  S C Fahrenkrug; A Blake; D F Carlson; T Doran; A Van Eenennaam; D Faber; C Galli; Q Gao; P B Hackett; N Li; E A Maga; W M Muir; J D Murray; D Shi; R Stotish; E Sullivan; J F Taylor; M Walton; M Wheeler; B Whitelaw; B P Glenn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  The concerted impact of domestication and transposon insertions on methylation patterns between dogs and grey wolves.

Authors:  Ilana Janowitz Koch; Michelle M Clark; Michael J Thompson; Kerry A Deere-Machemer; Jun Wang; Lionel Duarte; Gitanjali E Gnanadesikan; Eskender L McCoy; Liudmilla Rubbi; Daniel R Stahler; Matteo Pellegrini; Elaine A Ostrander; Robert K Wayne; Janet S Sinsheimer; Bridgett M vonHoldt
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 5.  Methods to address poultry robustness and welfare issues through breeding and associated ethical considerations.

Authors:  William M Muir; Heng-Wei Cheng; Candace Croney
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Thyroid transcriptome analysis reveals different adaptive responses to cold environmental conditions between two chicken breeds.

Authors:  Shanshan Xie; Xukai Yang; Dehe Wang; Feng Zhu; Ning Yang; Zhuocheng Hou; Zhonghua Ning
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Performance differences of Rhode Island Red, Bashang Long-tail Chicken, and their reciprocal crossbreds under natural cold stress.

Authors:  Shanshan Xie; Xukai Yang; Yahui Gao; Wenjie Jiao; Xinghua Li; Yajie Li; Zhonghua Ning
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 8.  Current Perspectives of the Chicken Gastrointestinal Tract and Its Microbiome.

Authors:  Daniel Borda-Molina; Jana Seifert; Amélia Camarinha-Silva
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 7.271

9.  Indirect genetic effects for growth rate in domestic pigs alter aggressive and manipulative biting behaviour.

Authors:  Irene Camerlink; Winanda W Ursinus; Piter Bijma; Bas Kemp; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Genetic diversity and population structure of indigenous chicken in Rwanda using microsatellite markers.

Authors:  Richard Habimana; Tobias Otieno Okeno; Kiplangat Ngeno; Sylvere Mboumba; Pauline Assami; Anique Ahou Gbotto; Christian Tiambo Keambou; Kizito Nishimwe; Janvier Mahoro; Nasser Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.