Literature DB >> 20308412

Sequential feeding using whole wheat and a separate protein-mineral concentrate improved feed efficiency in laying hens.

M Umar Faruk1, I Bouvarel, N Même, N Rideau, L Roffidal, H M Tukur, D Bastianelli, Y Nys, P Lescoat.   

Abstract

The effect of feeding nutritionally different diets in sequential or loose-mix systems on the performance of laying hen was investigated from 16 to 46 wk of age. Equal proportions of whole wheat grain and protein-mineral concentrate (balancer diet) were fed either alternatively (sequential) or together (loose-mix) to ISA Brown hens. The control was fed a complete layer diet conventionally. Each treatment was allocated 16 cages and each cage contained 5 birds. Light was provided 16 h daily (0400 to 2000 h). Feed offered was controlled (121 g/bird per d) and distributed twice (4 and 11 h after lights-on). In the sequential treatment, only wheat was fed at first distribution, followed by balancer diet at the second distribution. In loose-mix, the 2 rations were mixed and fed together during the 2 distributions. Leftover feed was always removed before the next distribution. Sequential feeding reduced total feed intake when compared with loose-mix and control. It had lower wheat (-9 g/bird per d) but higher balancer (+1.7 g/bird per d) intakes than loose-mix. Egg production, egg mass, and egg weight were similar among treatments. This led to an improvement in efficiency of feed utilization in sequential compared with loose-mix and control (10 and 5%, respectively). Birds fed sequentially had lower calculated ME (kcal/bird per d) intake than those fed in loose-mix and control. Calculated CP (g/bird per d) intake was reduced in sequential compared with loose-mix and control. Sequentially fed hens were lighter in BW. However, they had heavier gizzard, pancreas, and liver. Similar liver lipid was observed among treatments. Liver glycogen was higher in loose-mix than the 2 other treatments. It was concluded that feeding whole wheat and balancer diet, sequentially or loosely mixed, had no negative effect on performance in laying hens. Thus, the 2 systems are alternative to conventional feeding. The increased efficiency of feed utilization in sequential feeding is an added advantage compared with loose-mix and thus could be employed in situations where it is practicable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20308412     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2009-00360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  2 in total

Review 1.  Prospects from agroecology and industrial ecology for animal production in the 21st century.

Authors:  B Dumont; L Fortun-Lamothe; M Jouven; M Thomas; M Tichit
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Modulation of energy and protein supplies in sequential feeding in laying hens.

Authors:  M Traineau; I Bouvarel; C Mulsant; L Roffidal; C Launay; P Lescoat
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.