Literature DB >> 20308106

Building off-the-shelf tissue-engineered composites.

Timothy Burg1, Cheryl A P Cass, Richard Groff, Matthew Pepper, Karen J L Burg.   

Abstract

Rapid advances in technology have created the realistic possibility of personalized medicine. In 2000, Time magazine listed tissue engineering as one of the 'hottest 10 career choices'. However, in the past decade, only a handful of tissue-engineered products were translated to the clinical market and none were financially viable. The reality of complex business planning and the high-investment, high-technology environment was not apparent, and the promise of tissue engineering was overstated. In the meantime, biologists were steadily applying three-dimensional benchtop tissue-culture systems for cellular research, but the systems were gelatinous and thus limited in their ability to facilitate the development of complex tissues. Now, the bioengineering literature has seen an emergence of literature describing biofabrication of tissues and organs. However, if one looks closely, again, the viable products appear distant. 'Rapid' prototyping to reproduce the intricate patterns of whole organs using large volumes of cellular components faces daunting challenges. Homogenous forms are being labelled 'tissues', but, in fact, do not represent the heterogeneous structure of the native biological system. In 2003, we disclosed the concept of combining rapid prototyping techniques with tissue engineering technologies to facilitate precision development of heterogeneous complex tissue-test systems, i.e. systems to be used for drug discovery and the study of cellular behaviour, biomedical devices and progression of disease. The focus of this paper is on the challenges we have faced since that time, moving this concept towards reality, using the case of breast tissue as an example.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20308106     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  6 in total

Review 1.  The normal microenvironment directs mammary gland development.

Authors:  Erin J McCave; Cheryl A P Cass; Karen J L Burg; Brian W Booth
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 2.  Barriers to the clinical translation of orthopedic tissue engineering.

Authors:  Christopher H Evans
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Matrix compositions and the development of breast acini and ducts in 3D cultures.

Authors:  Muthulekha Swamydas; Jill M Eddy; Karen J L Burg; Didier Dréau
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 4.  Application of whole-organ tissue engineering in hepatology.

Authors:  Basak E Uygun; Martin L Yarmush; Korkut Uygun
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 5.  3D bioprinting: improving in vitro models of metastasis with heterogeneous tumor microenvironments.

Authors:  Jacob L Albritton; Jordan S Miller
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.758

6.  Development of miniaturized walking biological machines.

Authors:  Vincent Chan; Kidong Park; Mitchell B Collens; Hyunjoon Kong; Taher A Saif; Rashid Bashir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.