Literature DB >> 20308055

Prevalence of the use of self-tests by adults in the United Kingdom: a questionnaire survey.

A Ryan1, S Wilson, S Greenfield.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-tests that people can do without a health professional are widely available, but there is little information about how many people have used one. Our aim was to describe the prevalence of use.
METHODS: An initial questionnaire, sent to 8048 adults registered with six general practices in North Birmingham and Warwickshire and Worcestershire, asked whether the person had self-tested. A second questionnaire validated the use for people from the final four practices by asking how each self-test had been obtained and why it had been used.
RESULTS: The age-standardised prevalence of confirmed use for any self-test other than for pregnancy or high blood pressure was 47 (95% confidence interval (CI): 37-57) per 1000 women and 22 (95% CI: 14-30) per 1000 men. If everyone who initially reported use but did not return an eligible second questionnaire had the same rates of confirmed use as eligible responders, this would increase to 95 (95% CI: 81-110) per 1000 women and 55 (95% CI: 41-68) per 1000 men.
CONCLUSION: An appreciable minority of the population have self-tested for medical conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20308055     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdq018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


  5 in total

1.  Psychological, situational and application-related determinants of the intention to self-test: a factorial survey among students.

Authors:  Pinar Kuecuekbalaban; Tim Rostalski; Silke Schmidt; Holger Muehlan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Evaluation and enumeration of online test providers for sexually transmitted infections, specifically chlamydia, in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Chantal den Daas; Bob Sukel; Hanna Bos; Ingrid van den Broek
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Towards a decision aid for self-tests: Users' experiences in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Willemijn M den Oudendammer; Jacqueline E W Broerse
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Interpreting and acting upon home blood pressure readings: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Konstantina Vasileiou; Julie Barnett; Terry Young
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Socio-demographic, health-related, and individual correlates of diagnostic self-testing by lay people: Results from a representative survey in Germany.

Authors:  Pinar Kuecuekbalaban; Silke Schmidt; Manfred Beutel; Kerstin Weidner; Martina de Zwaan; Elmar Braehler; Holger Muehlan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.