Literature DB >> 20307584

Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex specifically processes general - but not personal - knowledge deception: Multiple brain networks for lying.

Francesca Mameli1, Simona Mrakic-Sposta, Maurizio Vergari, Manuela Fumagalli, Margherita Macis, Roberta Ferrucci, Francesco Nordio, Dario Consonni, Giuseppe Sartori, Alberto Priori.   

Abstract

Despite intensive research into ways of detecting deception in legal, moral and clinical contexts, few experimental data are available on the neural substrate for the different types of lies. We used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to modulate dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) function and to assess its influence on various types of lies. Twenty healthy volunteers were tested before and after tDCS (anodal and sham). In each session the Guilty Knowledge Task and Visual Attention Task were administered at baseline and immediately after tDCS ended. A computer-controlled task was used to evaluate truthful responses and lie responses to questions referring to personal information and general knowledge. Dependent variables collected were reaction times (RTs) and accuracy. At baseline the RTs were significantly longer for lies than for truthful responses. After sham stimulation, lie responses remained unchanged (p = 0.24) but after anodal tDCS, RTs decreased significantly only for lies involving general knowledge (p = 0.02). tDCS left the Visual Attention Task unaffected. These findings show that manipulating DLPFC function with tDCS specifically modulates deceptive responses for general information leaving those on personal information unaffected. Multiple cortical networks intervene in deception involving general and personal knowledge. Deception referring to general and personal knowledge probably involves multiple cortical networks. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20307584     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  19 in total

Review 1.  tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review.

Authors:  Liron Jacobson; Meni Koslowsky; Michal Lavidor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Andre Russowsky Brunoni; Michael A Nitsche; Nadia Bolognini; Marom Bikson; Tim Wagner; Lotfi Merabet; Dylan J Edwards; Antoni Valero-Cabre; Alexander Rotenberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Roberta Ferrucci; Alberto Priori; Paulo Sergio Boggio; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 3.  The uncertain outcome of prefrontal tDCS.

Authors:  Sara Tremblay; Jean-François Lepage; Alex Latulipe-Loiselle; Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Effects of Online Single Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices in Deceptive Processing: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Bruce Luber; Lysianne Beynel; Timothy Spellman; Hannah Gura; Markus Ploesser; Kate Termini; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  The presentation order of cue and target matters in deception study.

Authors:  Guangheng Dong; Yanbo Hu; Qilin Lu; Haiyan Wu
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.759

6.  Kamin blocking is associated with reduced medial-frontal gyrus activation: implications for prediction error abnormality in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Paula M Moran; Jennifer L Rouse; Benjamin Cross; Rhiannon Corcoran; Martin Schürmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Bilateral bi-cephalic tDCS with two active electrodes of the same polarity modulates bilateral cognitive processes differentially [corrected].

Authors:  Elise Klein; Anne Mann; Stefan Huber; Johannes Bloechle; Klaus Willmes; Ahmed A Karim; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Korbinian Moeller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Does the inferior frontal sulcus play a functional role in deception? A neuronavigated theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Bruno Verschuere; Teresa Schuhmann; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Modulation of untruthful responses with non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Shirley Fecteau; Paulo Boggio; Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Telling lies: the irrepressible truth?

Authors:  Emma J Williams; Lewis A Bott; John Patrick; Michael B Lewis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.