Literature DB >> 20306350

Research misconduct policies of social science journals and impact factor.

David B Resnik1, Daniel Patrone, Shyamal Peddada.   

Abstract

In this study we gathered data on the misconduct policies of social science journals and combined it with the data from our previous study on journal misconduct policies, which did not include enough social science journals for data analysis. Consistent with our earlier finding, impact factor of the journal was the only variable significantly associated with whether a journal had a formal (written) misconduct policy with an odds-ratio of 1.72 (p < 0.01). We did not find that type of science (physical, biomedical, or social) or publisher had a significant effect on whether a journal had a policy. Another important finding is that less than half of the journals that responded to the survey had a formal misconduct policy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20306350      PMCID: PMC3065865          DOI: 10.1080/08989621003641181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  4 in total

1.  Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey.

Authors:  E Wager; S Fiack; C Graf; A Robinson; I Rowlands
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  The journal impact factor: how to interpret its true value and importance.

Authors:  Andrzej Grzybowski
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2009-02

3.  Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.

Authors:  E Garfield
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-11-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Research misconduct policies of scientific journals.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Shyamal Peddada; Winnon Brunson
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.622

  4 in total
  12 in total

1.  Authorship policies of scientific journals.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Ana M Tyler; Jennifer R Black; Grace Kissling
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Conflict of Interest and Funding Disclosure Policies of Environmental, Occupational, and Public Health Journals.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Brandon Konecny; Grace E Kissling
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.162

3.  Dual-use review policies of biomedical research journals.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Dionne D Barner; Gregg E Dinse
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2011-03

4.  Penetrating the omerta of predatory publishing: the romanian connection.

Authors:  Dragan Djuric
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Effect of impact factor and discipline on journal data sharing policies.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Melissa Morales; Rachel Landrum; Min Shi; Jessica Minnier; Nicole A Vasilevsky; Robin E Champieux
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Judit Dobránszki
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Plagiarism among collaborators.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Gregg E Dinse
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals.

Authors:  Xavier Bosch; Cristina Hernández; Juan M Pericas; Pamela Doti; Ana Marušić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Policies and initiatives aimed at addressing research misconduct in high-income countries.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Zubin Master
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.