PURPOSE: Characterize bortezomibpharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in relapsed myeloma patients after single and repeat intravenous administration at two doses. METHODS: Forty-two patients were randomized to receive bortezomib 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m(2), days 1, 4, 8, 11, for up to eight 21-day treatment cycles (n = 21, each dose group). Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis were taken on days 1 and 11, cycles 1 and 3. Observational efficacy and safety data were collected. RESULTS: Twelve patients in each dose group were evaluable for pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. Plasma clearance decreased with repeat dosing (102-112 L/h for first dose; 15-32 L/h following repeat dosing), with associated increases in systemic exposure and terminal half-life. Systemic exposures of bortezomib were similar between dose groups considering the relatively narrow dose range and the observed pharmacokinetic variability, although there was no readily apparent deviation from dose-proportionality. Blood 20S proteasome inhibition profiles were similar between groups with mean maximum inhibition ranging from 70 to 84% and decreasing toward baseline over the dosing interval. Response rate (all 42 patients) was 50%, including 7% complete responses. The safety profile was consistent with the predictable and manageable profile previously established; data suggested milder toxicity in the 1.0 mg/m(2) group. CONCLUSIONS:Bortezomib pharmacokinetics change with repeat dose administration, characterized by a reduction in plasma clearance and associated increase in systemic exposure. Bortezomib is pharmacodynamically active and tolerable at 1.0 and 1.3 mg/m(2) doses, with recovery toward baseline blood proteasome activity over the dosing interval following repeat dose administration, supporting the current clinical dosing regimen.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Characterize bortezomib pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in relapsed myelomapatients after single and repeat intravenous administration at two doses. METHODS: Forty-two patients were randomized to receive bortezomib 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m(2), days 1, 4, 8, 11, for up to eight 21-day treatment cycles (n = 21, each dose group). Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis were taken on days 1 and 11, cycles 1 and 3. Observational efficacy and safety data were collected. RESULTS: Twelve patients in each dose group were evaluable for pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. Plasma clearance decreased with repeat dosing (102-112 L/h for first dose; 15-32 L/h following repeat dosing), with associated increases in systemic exposure and terminal half-life. Systemic exposures of bortezomib were similar between dose groups considering the relatively narrow dose range and the observed pharmacokinetic variability, although there was no readily apparent deviation from dose-proportionality. Blood 20S proteasome inhibition profiles were similar between groups with mean maximum inhibition ranging from 70 to 84% and decreasing toward baseline over the dosing interval. Response rate (all 42 patients) was 50%, including 7% complete responses. The safety profile was consistent with the predictable and manageable profile previously established; data suggested milder toxicity in the 1.0 mg/m(2) group. CONCLUSIONS:Bortezomib pharmacokinetics change with repeat dose administration, characterized by a reduction in plasma clearance and associated increase in systemic exposure. Bortezomib is pharmacodynamically active and tolerable at 1.0 and 1.3 mg/m(2) doses, with recovery toward baseline blood proteasome activity over the dosing interval following repeat dose administration, supporting the current clinical dosing regimen.
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Hannah Briemberg; Sundar Jagannath; Patrick Y Wen; Bart Barlogie; James Berenson; Seema Singhal; David S Siegel; David Irwin; Michael Schuster; Gordan Srkalovic; Raymond Alexanian; S Vincent Rajkumar; Steven Limentani; Melissa Alsina; Robert Z Orlowski; Kevin Najarian; Dixie Esseltine; Kenneth C Anderson; Anthony A Amato Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Pieter Sonneveld; Michael Schuster; David Irwin; Edward Stadtmauer; Thierry Facon; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Dina Ben-Yehuda; Sagar Lonial; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Donna Reece; Jesus San Miguel; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; Jamie Cavenagh; Melissa Alsina; S Vincent Rajkumar; Martha Lacy; Andrzej Jakubowiak; William Dalton; Anthony Boral; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; David Schenkein; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: Blood Date: 2007-08-09 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Teresa Pekol; J Scott Daniels; Jason Labutti; Ian Parsons; Darrell Nix; Elizabeth Baronas; Frank Hsieh; Liang-Shang Gan; Gerald Miwa Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2005-03-11 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Jason Labutti; Ian Parsons; Ron Huang; Gerald Miwa; Liang-Shang Gan; J Scott Daniels Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Sagar Lonial; Paul G Richardson; Jesús San Miguel; Pieter Sonneveld; Michael W Schuster; Joan Bladé; Jamie Cavenagh; S Vincent Rajkumar; Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Kenneth C Anderson; Jean-Luc Harousseau Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2008-08-18 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Martin Schmidt-Hieber; Robert Dabrowski; Babette Aicher; Philipp Lohneis; Antonia Busse; Carola Tietze-Buerger; Birgit Reufi; Eckhard Thiel; Igor Wolfgang Blau Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Patricia M LoRusso; Karthik Venkatakrishnan; Ramesh K Ramanathan; John Sarantopoulos; Daniel Mulkerin; Stephen I Shibata; Anne Hamilton; Afshin Dowlati; Sridhar Mani; Michelle A Rudek; Chris H Takimoto; Rachel Neuwirth; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Percy Ivy Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 12.531