Literature DB >> 20306099

Experimental study determining the mechanical properties of dental floss holders.

Anna Wolff1, Maria Pritsch, Christof Dörfer, Hans Jörg Staehle.   

Abstract

This study determined the mechanical properties of 19 dental floss holders. Eight single-use holders and 11 reusable ones were tested. An in vitro model with dental proximal contact strength of 8 N was created. Every device had to pass the proximal contact 30 times. We measured (1) the displacement of the floss [mm], (2) the force [N] necessary to pass the proximal contact after the 30th passage, (3) the loosening of the floss (offset [mm]), and (4) the change in the distance between the branches [mm]. Each measurement was repeated seven times. The results are displacement of the floss after 30 passages, 2.0 to 9.2 mm; passage force, 2.6 to 11 N; increases in branch distance, 0-2.9 mm; offset of the floss, 0-1.8 mm (all numbers are medians). Based on cleaning a full dentition (30 passages), we suggest introducing minimal requirements of <4 mm for the displacement of the floss, ≥11 N for the force, and <0.1 mm for the difference in branch distance and the offset. Only two products fulfilled our criteria. The tests show that dental floss holders vary extremely in their mechanical properties. Their effective use seems often impossible due to limited mechanical properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20306099     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0399-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  19 in total

1.  Mesiodistal crown diameters of the deciduous and permanent teeth in individuals.

Authors:  E JENSEN; P KAI-JEN YEN; C F MOORREES; S O THOMSEN
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1957-02       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 2.  Dental flossing and interproximal caries: a systematic review.

Authors:  P P Hujoel; J Cunha-Cruz; D W Banting; W J Loesche
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Comparative effectiveness of flossing and brushing in reducing interproximal bleeding.

Authors:  R C Graves; J A Disney; J W Stamm
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.993

4.  The effect of supervised oral hygiene on the gingivae of children.

Authors:  J Lindhe; G Koch
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 4.419

5.  Effectiveness of three interproximal cleaning devices.

Authors:  S M Mauriello; J D Bader; M C George; P A Klute
Journal:  Clin Prev Dent       Date:  1987 May-Jun

6.  A 30-day clinical comparison of a novel interdental cleaning device and dental floss in the reduction of plaque and gingivitis.

Authors:  Matthew J Cronin; Wayne Z Dembling; MaryAnn Cugini; Maureen C Thompson; Paul R Warren
Journal:  J Clin Dent       Date:  2005

7.  Comparison of interdental cleaning methods: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Margaret A Jackson; Margaret Kellett; Helen V Worthington; Valerie Clerehugh
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.993

8.  Width/length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dentition in man.

Authors:  J D Sterrett; T Oliver; F Robinson; W Fortson; B Knaak; C M Russell
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.728

9.  Evaluating the efficacy of a new flossing aid.

Authors:  V W Spolsky; D A Perry; Z Meng; P Kissel
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 10.  The efficacy of oral irrigation in addition to a toothbrush on plaque and the clinical parameters of periodontal inflammation: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Husseini; D E Slot; G A Van der Weijden
Journal:  Int J Dent Hyg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.477

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.