Literature DB >> 20306098

Ink-jet printout of radiographs on transparent film and glossy paper versus monitor display: an ROC analysis.

Sebastian Kühl1, Frank Krummenauer, Dorothea Dagassan-Berndt, Thomas J Lambrecht, Bernd d'Hoedt, Ralf Kurt Willy Schulze.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the depiction ability of small grayscale contrasts in ink-jet printouts of digital radiographs on different print media with CRT monitor. A CCD-based digital cephalometric image of a stepless aluminum wedge containing 50 bur holes of different depth was cut into 100 isometric images. Each image was printed on glossy paper and on transparent film by means of a high-resolution desktop inkjet printer at specific settings. The printed images were viewed under standardized conditions, and the perceptibility of the bur holes was evaluated and compared to the perceptibility on a 17-in CRT monitor. Thirty observers stated their blinded decision on a five-point confidence scale. Areas (Az) under receiver operating characteristics curves were calculated and compared using the pair wise sign tests. Overall agreement was estimated using Cohen's kappa device and observer bias using McNemar's test. Glossy paper prints and monitor display revealed significantly higher (P < 0.001) average Az values (0.83) compared to prints on transparent film (0.79), which was caused by higher sensitivity. Specificity was similar for all modalities. The sensitivity was dependent on the mean gray scale values for the transparent film.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20306098     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0400-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  14 in total

Review 1.  Matters to consider when implementing direct digital radiography in the dental office.

Authors:  A Wenzel
Journal:  Int J Comput Dent       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.883

2.  Detail enhancement in prints of radiographs. Use of a linear radial transmission filter.

Authors:  L M Weinstein; P M Fitzer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Using receiver operating characteristic methodology to evaluate the diagnostic quality of radiography on paper prints versus film.

Authors:  T A Bley; E Kotter; U Saueressig; O S Springer; D Fisch; N A Ghanem; M Langer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Subjective image quality of digital panoramic radiographs displayed on monitor and printed on various hardcopy media.

Authors:  Frieda Gijbels; Gerard Sanderink; Herman Pauwels; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-12-02       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Accuracy of digital panoramic images displayed on monitor, glossy paper, and film for assessment of mandibular third molars.

Authors:  Ingibjörg S Benediktsdóttir; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2004-08

6.  Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. Film versus print.

Authors:  Linda L Otis; Robert G Sherman
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  The film-based printout using Tetenal Printing Solution II.

Authors:  O Geissler; U Rother
Journal:  Int J Comput Dent       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.883

8.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Evaluation of the image quality of ink-jet printed paper copies of digital chest radiographs as compared with film: a receiver operating characteristic study.

Authors:  K Lyttkens; T Kirkhorn; M Kehler; B Andersson; A Ebbesen; P Hochbergs; O Jarlman; C G Lindberg; N G Holmer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  The gray-scale ink-jet printer: value in making hard copies of digital images.

Authors:  M J Combs; J Snell; W S Cail; T Maier; D A Buck
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  1 in total

1.  The influence of ambient lighting on the detection of small contrast elements in digital dental radiographs.

Authors:  Till Schriewer; Ralf Schulze; Andreas Filippi; Irene Mischak; Michael Payer; Dorothea Dagassan-Berndt; Sebastian Kühl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 3.573

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.