Literature DB >> 20306032

Clinical and survival impact of FDG PET in patients with suspicion of recurrent cervical carcinoma.

Amandine Pallardy1, Caroline Bodet-Milin, Aurore Oudoux, Loïc Campion, Emmanuelle Bourbouloux, Christine Sagan, Catherine Ansquer, Aude Testard, Isabelle Resche, Boumédiène Bridji, Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré, Caroline Rousseau.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the contribution of (18)F-FDG PET to the clinical management and survival outcome of patients suspected of recurrent cervical carcinoma and in line with the hypothesis that early diagnosis of recurrent cervical cancer may improve overall survival.
METHODS: A total of 40 patients underwent conventional imaging (CI) and FDG PET/CT for suspected cervical cancer. Clinical management decisions were recorded with CI and additional PET/CT. Discordances and concordances between CI and PET/CT results were compared to the final diagnosis as based on histopathology analysis or follow-up considered as the gold standard.
RESULTS: The final diagnosis was established pathologically (n = 25) or by median clinical follow-up for 48 months after the PET (n = 15). The PET/CT was positive in 76% (20/26) of patients compared to 19% (6/26) with CI. Globally PET/CT modified the treatment plan in 55% (22/40) of patients and in 75% (18/24) when the CI was negative prior to PET/CT. These changes led to the use of previously unplanned therapeutic procedures in 37.5% (15/40). When FDG PET was positive for recurrence (> 3 foci), the median overall survival was 12 months (2-70) compared to patients with PET findings with < or = 1 focus for which the median survival was not attained (p = 0.007). A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors demonstrated that abnormal FDG uptake (> 3 foci) was the most significant factor (p < 0.03) for death from cervical cancer.
CONCLUSION: FDG PET is a valuable tool in the case of suspected recurrence of cervical cancer on account of its impact on treatment planning and especially in predicting patient outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20306032     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1417-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  27 in total

1.  Detection of early recurrence with 18F-FDG PET in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Sang-Young Ryu; Moon-Hong Kim; Suck-Chul Choi; Chang-Woon Choi; Kyung-Hee Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Posttherapy surveillance monitoring of cervical cancer by FDG-PET.

Authors:  Perry W Grigsby; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; David G Mutch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Improved prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET using a simple visual analysis of tumor characteristics in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Tom R Miller; Edward Pinkus; Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Cervical and vulva cancer: changes in FIGO definitions of staging.

Authors:  J H Shepherd
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1996-05

5.  FDG-PET in the detection of recurrence of uterine cervical carcinoma following radiation therapy--tumor volume and FDG uptake value.

Authors:  Hideyuki Sakurai; Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Tetsuo Nonaka; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Mariko Shioya; Hiroki Kiyohara; Hiroyuki Katoh; Yuko Nakayama; Masatoshi Hasegawa; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy on cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  K Hatano; Y Sekiya; H Araki; M Sakai; T Togawa; Y Narita; Y Akiyama; S Kimura; H Ito
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Association of posttherapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Julie K Schwarz; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Restaging of recurrent cervical carcinoma with dual-phase [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Chyong-Huey Lai; Kuan-Gen Huang; Lai-Chu See; Tzu-Chen Yen; Chien-Sheng Tsai; Ting-Chang Chang; Hung-Hsueh Chou; Koon-Kwan Ng; Swei Hsueh; Ji-Hong Hong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Posttherapy [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in carcinoma of the cervix: response and outcome.

Authors:  Perry W Grigsby; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; Janet Rader; Imran Zoberi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Standardized uptake value in para-aortic lymph nodes is a significant prognostic factor in patients with primary advanced squamous cervical cancer.

Authors:  Tzu-Chen Yen; Lai-Chu See; Chyong-Huey Lai; Chien-Sheng Tsai; Angel Chao; Swei Hsueh; Ji-Hong Hong; Ting-Chang Chang; Koon-Kwan Ng
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  9 in total

1.  The SUVmax (maximum standardized uptake value for F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose) and serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-ag) function as prognostic biomarkers in patients with primary cervical cancer.

Authors:  LingLing Pan; JingYi Cheng; Min Zhou; ZhiFeng Yao; YingJian Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Tumor radiomic heterogeneity: Multiparametric functional imaging to characterize variability and predict response following cervical cancer radiation therapy.

Authors:  Stephen R Bowen; William T C Yuh; Daniel S Hippe; Wei Wu; Savannah C Partridge; Saba Elias; Guang Jia; Zhibin Huang; George A Sandison; Dennis Nelson; Michael V Knopp; Simon S Lo; Paul E Kinahan; Nina A Mayr
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  The Role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Synovial Sarcoma.

Authors:  Kyoung Jin Chang; Ilhan Lim; Joon Yeun Park; A Ra Jo; Chang Bae Kong; Won Seok Song; Wan Hyeong Jo; Soo Yong Lee; Jae Soo Koh; Byung Il Kim; Chang Woon Choi; Sang Moo Lim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-10-30

Review 4.  Opportunities for 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/CT in cervical-vaginal neuroendocrine carcinoma: case series and literature review.

Authors:  Yin Lin; Wan Y Lin; Ji A Liang; Yu Y Lu; Hsin Y Wang; Shih C Tsai; Chia H Kao
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 5.  Positron emission tomography alone, positron emission tomography-computed tomography and computed tomography in diagnosing recurrent cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Xiao; Jia Wei; Yicheng Zhang; Weining Xiong
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.318

6.  Complementary Roles of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Suspected Recurrence of Cervical Squamous Cell Cancer.

Authors:  Ying-Ying Hu; Wei Fan; Xu Zhang; Pei-Yan Liang; Xiao-Ping Lin; Ya-Rui Zhang; Yuan-Hua Li
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Clinical Value of Combining 18F-FDG PET/CT and Routine Serum Tumor Markers in The Early Detection of Recurrence Among Follow-up Patients Treated for Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Rajiv Rai Sookha; Wenhua Zhi; Yanxia Shen; Cordelle Lazare; Ling Wang; Yifan Meng; Canhui Cao; Junbo Hu; Peng Wu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update.

Authors:  Neerja Bhatla; Daisuke Aoki; Daya Nand Sharma; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 4.447

9.  18F-FDG PET/computed tomography scan in patients with suspicion of recurrent neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Jiang; Guozhu Hou; Li Huo; Fang Li; Zhaohui Zhu; Wuying Cheng
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.690

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.