Literature DB >> 20304955

Genetic background affects properties of satellite cells and mdx phenotypes.

So-ichiro Fukada1, Daisuke Morikawa, Yukiko Yamamoto, Tokuyuki Yoshida, Noriaki Sumie, Masahiko Yamaguchi, Takahito Ito, Yuko Miyagoe-Suzuki, Shin'ichi Takeda, Kazutake Tsujikawa, Hiroshi Yamamoto.   

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the most common lethal genetic disorder of children. The mdx (C57BL/10 background, C57BL/10-mdx) mouse is a widely used model of DMD, but the histopathological hallmarks of DMD, such as the smaller number of myofibers, accumulation of fat and fibrosis, and insufficient regeneration of myofibers, are not observed in adult C57BL/10-mdx except for in the diaphragm. In this study, we showed that DBA/2 mice exhibited decreased muscle weight, as well as lower myofiber numbers after repeated degeneration-regeneration cycles. Furthermore, the self-renewal efficiency of satellite cells of DBA/2 is lower than that of C57BL/6. Therefore, we produced a DBA/2-mdx strain by crossing DBA/2 and C57BL/10-mdx. The hind limb muscles of DBA/2-mdx mice exhibited lower muscle weight, fewer myofibers, and increased fat and fibrosis, in comparison with C57BL/10-mdx. Moreover, remarkable muscle weakness was observed in DBA/2-mdx. These results indicate that the DBA/2-mdx mouse is a more suitable model for DMD studies, and the efficient satellite cell self-renewal ability of C57BL/10-mdx might explain the difference in pathologies between humans and mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20304955      PMCID: PMC2861106          DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9440            Impact factor:   4.307


  43 in total

Review 1.  Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration.

Authors:  Sophie B P Chargé; Michael A Rudnicki
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  A comparison of muscle precursor replication in crush-injured skeletal muscle of Swiss and BALBc mice.

Authors:  M D Grounds; J K McGeachie
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  Satellite cells are mitotically quiescent in mature mouse muscle: an EM and radioautographic study.

Authors:  E Schultz; M C Gibson; T Champion
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1978-12

4.  Skeletal muscle satellite cells: changes in proliferation potential as a function of age.

Authors:  E Schultz; B H Lipton
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.432

5.  X chromosome-linked muscular dystrophy (mdx) in the mouse.

Authors:  G Bulfield; W G Siller; P A Wight; K J Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Impaired regeneration of dystrophin-deficient muscle fibers is caused by exhaustion of myogenic cells.

Authors:  M A M Luz; M J Marques; H Santo Neto
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.590

7.  Murine chromosomal regions correlated with longevity.

Authors:  R Gelman; A Watson; R Bronson; E Yunis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The complete sequence of dystrophin predicts a rod-shaped cytoskeletal protein.

Authors:  M Koenig; A P Monaco; L M Kunkel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-04-22       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Chronic myopathy induced by repeated bupivacaine injections.

Authors:  M Sadeh; K Czyewski; L Z Stern
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.181

10.  Skeletal muscle pathology in X chromosome-linked muscular dystrophy (mdx) mouse.

Authors:  Y Tanabe; K Esaki; T Nomura
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 17.088

View more
  79 in total

Review 1.  Are human and mouse satellite cells really the same?

Authors:  Luisa Boldrin; Francesco Muntoni; Jennifer E Morgan
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 2.  Fat deposition and accumulation in the damaged and inflamed skeletal muscle: cellular and molecular players.

Authors:  Clara Sciorati; Emilio Clementi; Angelo A Manfredi; Patrizia Rovere-Querini
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Mouse Models of Muscle Fibrosis.

Authors:  Antonio L Serrano; Pura Muñoz-Cánoves
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 4.  What do mouse models of muscular dystrophy tell us about the DAPC and its components?

Authors:  Charlotte Whitmore; Jennifer Morgan
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Nutraceutical and pharmaceutical cocktails did not improve muscle function or reduce histological damage in D2-mdx mice.

Authors:  Hannah R Spaulding; Tiffany Quindry; Kayleen Hammer; John C Quindry; Joshua T Selsby
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-07-11

Review 6.  Satellite Cells in Muscular Dystrophy - Lost in Polarity.

Authors:  Natasha C Chang; Fabien P Chevalier; Michael A Rudnicki
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 11.951

7.  Magnetic Resonance Monitoring of Disease Progression in mdx Mice on Different Genetic Backgrounds.

Authors:  Ravneet Vohra; Abhinandan Batra; Sean C Forbes; Krista Vandenborne; Glenn A Walter
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 8.  What is the level of dystrophin expression required for effective therapy of Duchenne muscular dystrophy?

Authors:  Dominic J Wells
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 9.  Biotoxins in muscle regeneration research.

Authors:  Mohamed A A Mahdy
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Dusp6 is a genetic modifier of growth through enhanced ERK activity.

Authors:  Andy H Vo; Kayleigh A Swaggart; Anna Woo; Quan Q Gao; Alexis R Demonbreun; Katherine S Fallon; Mattia Quattrocelli; Michele Hadhazy; Patrick G T Page; Zugen Chen; Ascia Eskin; Kevin Squire; Stanley F Nelson; Elizabeth M McNally
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 6.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.