Literature DB >> 2030481

Improvement in survival of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia utilizing a strategy of delayed repair after medical and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation stabilization.

C W Breaux1, T M Rouse, W S Cain, K E Georgeson.   

Abstract

Patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) symptomatic at birth treated at this institution over the past 6 years were reviewed. The patients were divided into two chronological groups for analysis: group 1, consisting of 15 patients treated from January 1984 through October 1987, a period during which acute CDH was considered to be a surgical emergency; and group 2, comprising 20 patients treated from November 1987 through October 1989 using a management protocol of delayed repair following medical and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) stabilization. These two groups did not differ significantly in gestational age, birth weight, Apgar scores, hernia side, or age at admission. Group 2 had a longer mean interval from admission to repair (26.5 v 1.8 h, P = .01) and average age at repair (31.0 v 6.5 h, P = .02) than did group 1. Prosthetic closure of the diaphragmatic defect was required more frequently in group 2 then in group 1 (63% v 31%, P = .07). Survival in group 2 was significantly greater than in group 1 (55% v 20%, P = .04). Seven group 2 patients (35%) achieved a prerepair or pre-ECMO PO2 greater than 100 mm Hg and all survived; four of the 13 "nonresponders" also survived. ECMO was used in 11 group 2 patients with five survivors (45%); four of these patients underwent repair prior to ECMO and seven underwent repair while on ECMO.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2030481     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3468(91)90512-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  6 in total

1.  How often is extracorporeal membrane oxygenation needed in cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia?

Authors:  M C Soto Beauregard; J Murcia; L Lassaletta; S Salas; J Quero; J A Tovar
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Detrimental effects of standard medical therapy in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  D W Kays; M R Langham; D J Ledbetter; J L Talbert
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Contemporary management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  M W Butler; C J Stolar; R P Altman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  The long-term follow-up of patients with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a broad spectrum of morbidity.

Authors:  M G Peetsold; H A Heij; C M F Kneepkens; A F Nagelkerke; J Huisman; R J B J Gemke
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Stabilization and repair on ECMO.

Authors:  K P Lally; M S Paranka; J Roden; K E Georgeson; J M Wilson; C W Lillehei; C W Breaux; M Poon; R H Clark; J B Atkinson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Possibilities and limits in the treatment of congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  R Georgescu; L Chiuţu; R Nemeş; I Georgescu; A Stoica; E Georgescu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014-09-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.