Literature DB >> 20304680

Safety and efficacy of renal artery stenting following suboptimal renal angioplasty for de novo and restenotic ostial lesions: results from a nonrandomized, prospective multicenter registry.

John R Laird1, John Rundback, R Eugene Zierler, Gary J Becker, Charles O'Shaughnessy, John W Shuck, David Allie, Jeffrey W Olin, Kim Cantwell-Gab, Jack Thomas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This registry was designed to evaluate the Bridge Extra Support renal stent system (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) in the treatment of renal artery ostial lesions following suboptimal percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This consecutive, nonrandomized, prospective, multicenter registry enrolled 188 patients between April 1999 and May 2002 with single de novo or restenotic renal artery ostial lesions (>or=70% stenosis) who underwent implantation of a balloon-expandable stent immediately following unsuccessful PTRA. Primary safety endpoints were major adverse clinical events (MACE) at 30 days and 9-12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was absence of binary restenosis at 9-12 months with duplex ultrasonography (US). Secondary endpoints were acute success and quality-of-life (QOL) improvements (blood pressure, antihypertensive medications, renal function). The long-term effect of renal artery stenting on blood pressure and renal function was assessed to 36 months.
RESULTS: The acute procedure and clinical success rates were 92.9%. At 30 days, the MACE rate was 3.2%, with no instances of target lesion revascularization (TLR). At 9-12 months, the MACE rate was 16.5%, with five (2.7%) deaths and 14 (7.4%) instances of TLR. The rate of restenosis at 9-12 months with duplex US was 12.6%, and 94% of patients had QOL improvements. A significant reduction in systolic blood pressure occurred following renal artery stenting and persisted to 36 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Renal artery stenting is safe and efficacious in the treatment of single de novo and restenotic renal artery ostial lesions following suboptimal PTRA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20304680     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  5 in total

Review 1.  Update on intervention versus medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Albeir Y Mousa; Ali F AbuRahma; Joseph Bozzay; Mike Broce; Mark Bates
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Proper patient selection yields significant and sustained reduction in systolic blood pressure following renal artery stenting in patients with uncontrolled hypertension: long-term results from the HERCULES trial.

Authors:  George S Chrysant; Mark C Bates; Timothy M Sullivan; William B Bachinsky; Jeffrey J Popma; Lei Peng; Hend L Omran; Michael R Jaff
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 3.  Where and when device therapy may be useful in the management of drug-resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Herbert D Aronow; Jun Li; Sahil A Parikh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Rationale and design of two randomized sham-controlled trials of catheter-based renal denervation in subjects with uncontrolled hypertension in the absence (SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal) and presence (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Expansion) of antihypertensive medications: a novel approach using Bayesian design.

Authors:  Michael Böhm; Raymond R Townsend; Kazuomi Kario; David Kandzari; Felix Mahfoud; Michael A Weber; Roland E Schmieder; Konstantinos Tsioufis; Graeme L Hickey; Martin Fahy; Vanessa DeBruin; Sandeep Brar; Stuart Pocock
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  RX Herculink Elite(®) renal stent system: a review of its use for the treatment of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  William R Colyer
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2012-08-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.