Literature DB >> 20304594

Eight-year institutional review of carotid artery stenting.

Mark K Eskandari1, Asad A Usman, Manuel Garcia-Toca, Jon S Matsumura, Melina R Kibbe, Mark D Morasch, Heron E Rodriguez, William H Pearce.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Vascular surgeons have increasingly become proficient in carotid artery stenting (CAS) as an alternative treatment modality for cervical carotid artery occlusive disease. We analyzed our early and late outcomes of CAS over the last 8 years.
METHODS: We report a single-center retrospective review of 388 carotid bifurcation lesions treated with CAS using cerebral embolic protection from May 2001 to July 2009. Data analysis includes demographics, procedural records, duplex exams, arteriograms, and two-view plain radiographs over a mean follow-up time of 23.0 months (interquartile range, 10.9-35.4).
RESULTS: At the time of treatment, the mean age of the entire cohort (76% men and 24% women) is 71 years; 13% were >/=80 years of age, and 31% had a prior history of either carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and/or external beam neck irradiation (XRT). The mean carotid stenosis is 80%, and asymptomatic lesions represent 69% of the group. Overall 30-day rates of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction are 0.5%, 1.8%, and 0.8%, respectively. The combined death/stroke rate at 30 days is 2.3%. The 30-day major/minor stroke rates for analyzed subgroups are statistically significant only for XRT/recurrent stenosis vs de novo lesions, 0% and 2.6% (P = .03), but not for asymptomatic vs symptomatic patients, 1.9% and 1.7% (P = .91) and age <80 vs >/=80, 2.0% and 1.8% (P = .52), respectively. At long-term, the freedom from all strokes at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months was 99.2%, 97.6%, 96.7%, and 96.7%, respectively. At late follow-up, the restenosis rate is 3.5%. Restenosis rates for recurrent stenosis/XRT vs de novo lesions are 2.7% and 3.4% (P = .39). Among the restenotic lesions were two associated type III stent fractures in de novo lesions, both of which were closed-cell stents. An additional two other type I fractures have been identified, yielding a stent fracture rate of 5.5%. The late death rate for the entire group is 16.8%, with one stent-related death secondary to ipsilateral stroke at 20 months (0.3% death rate).
CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons performing CAS with embolic protection can achieve good early and late outcomes that are comparable to CEA benchmarks. Late stent failures (stroke, restenosis, and/or stent fatigue), while uncommon, are a recognized delayed problem. Copyright (c) 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20304594     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  4 in total

1.  Long-term outcome in patients with carotid artery stenting and contralateral carotid occlusion: a single neurovascular center prospective analysis.

Authors:  Aida Lago; Vera Parkhutik; Jose Ignacio Tembl; Fernando Aparici; Esperanza Mainar; Carmen Alcalá; Víctor Vázquez-Añón
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Factors affecting long-term restenosis after carotid stenting for carotid atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Jai Jai Shiva Shankar; Jingwen Zhang; Marlise dos Santos; Howard Lesiuk; Ravi Mohan; Cheemun Lum
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Prognostic Factors for Neurologic Outcome in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  Chi-Sheng Hung; Mao-Shin Lin; Ying-Hsien Chen; Ching-Chang Huang; Hung-Yuan Li; Hsien-Li Kao
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 4.  Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Mazurek; Krzysztof Malinowski; Kenneth Rosenfield; Laura Capoccia; Francesco Speziale; Gianmarco de Donato; Carlo Setacci; Christian Wissgott; Pasqualino Sirignano; Lukasz Tekieli; Andrey Karpenko; Waclaw Kuczmik; Eugenio Stabile; David Christopher Metzger; Max Amor; Adnan H Siddiqui; Antonio Micari; Piotr Pieniążek; Alberto Cremonesi; Joachim Schofer; Andrej Schmidt; Piotr Musialek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.