OBJECTIVES: First, to assess knowledge and attitudes of people aged 65 and over to the Advance Directives Document (ADD) and know the role that, in their opinion, a family doctor should play in the early planning of death. Second, to assess the level of knowledge and attitude of primary care physicians to that document, as well as to know the role played by these professionals. DESIGN: Qualitative, using discussion groups. Between March and May 2009 4 groups, 2 of physicians and 2 of older people, were formed. SETTING: Castile-La Mancha Primary Care Setting, Albacete and Guadalajara health areas. SUBJECTS: 15 people in the groups formed by older people and 13 in the groups of doctors. METHOD: The Krueger recommendations (1991) were followed both for the selection of subjects, conducting of the discussion groups and analysis of data. RESULTS: Doctors and patients have a positive attitude towards the ADD, but lack sufficient information to make more widespread use of it. Ignorance makes it impossible for patients to get information about the document and the lack of time makes it difficult for physicians to raise the issue in the consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Neither physicians nor the elderly have enough information regarding ADD, allowing us to recommend carrying out information campaigns and/or specific educational activities. According to physicians, alternatives to primary care consultations should be sought for patients to be informed.
OBJECTIVES: First, to assess knowledge and attitudes of people aged 65 and over to the Advance Directives Document (ADD) and know the role that, in their opinion, a family doctor should play in the early planning of death. Second, to assess the level of knowledge and attitude of primary care physicians to that document, as well as to know the role played by these professionals. DESIGN: Qualitative, using discussion groups. Between March and May 2009 4 groups, 2 of physicians and 2 of older people, were formed. SETTING: Castile-La Mancha Primary Care Setting, Albacete and Guadalajara health areas. SUBJECTS: 15 people in the groups formed by older people and 13 in the groups of doctors. METHOD: The Krueger recommendations (1991) were followed both for the selection of subjects, conducting of the discussion groups and analysis of data. RESULTS: Doctors and patients have a positive attitude towards the ADD, but lack sufficient information to make more widespread use of it. Ignorance makes it impossible for patients to get information about the document and the lack of time makes it difficult for physicians to raise the issue in the consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Neither physicians nor the elderly have enough information regarding ADD, allowing us to recommend carrying out information campaigns and/or specific educational activities. According to physicians, alternatives to primary care consultations should be sought for patients to be informed.
Authors: C M Puchalski; Z Zhong; M M Jacobs; E Fox; J Lynn; J Harrold; A Galanos; R S Phillips; R Califf; J M Teno Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lawrence S Wissow; Amy Belote; Wade Kramer; Amy Compton-Phillips; Robert Kritzler; Jonathan P Weiner Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Isamme N AlFayyad; Mohamad A Al-Tannir; Waleed A AlEssa; Humariya M Heena; Amani K Abu-Shaheen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eugenio Contreras-Fernández; Francisco Javier Barón-López; Camila Méndez-Martínez; José Carlos Canca-Sánchez; Isabel Cabezón Rodríguez; Francisco Rivas-Ruiz Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 1.137