Literature DB >> 20303890

Safe surgery, the human factors approach.

Tony O'Connor1, V Papanikolaou, I Keogh.   

Abstract

Studies estimate that a degree of error occurs in 5-15% of all hospital admissions, with 45% of errors occurring in the operating theatre. Staffing limitations, high turnover rates, site and side-specific surgical procedures, make operating theatres a high-risk environment. Valuable lessons may be learned from the aviation experience with error management. With over 70% of air-crashes occurring due to human rather than technical error, the Human Factors Approach to error recognises the potential for errors occurring due to human limitations, such as stress and fatigue. It encourages error reporting in a non-punitive environment, where it is seen as a valuable source of information, facilitating education and future error prevention. Errors in healthcare and surgery however, have been traditionally associated with secrecy and embarrassment, often reaching an unsatisfactory endpoint with no resultant education. Application of the Human Factors Approach to error management in healthcare, can only serve to improve safety standards in our hospitals and satisfy ever-increasing public expectations. Copyright 2009 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20303890     DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2009.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgeon        ISSN: 1479-666X            Impact factor:   2.392


  9 in total

1.  Inconsistent reporting of minimally invasive surgery errors.

Authors:  A D White; M Skelton; F Mushtaq; T W Pike; M Mon-Williams; J P A Lodge; R M Wilkie
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The use of error analysis to assess resident performance.

Authors:  Anne-Lise D D'Angelo; Katherine E Law; Elaine R Cohen; Jacob A Greenberg; Calvin Kwan; Caprice Greenberg; Douglas A Wiegmann; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  The effects of human factor related issues on assessors during the recruitment process for general and vascular surgery in the UK.

Authors:  Dsg Scrimgeour; R Patel; N Patel; J Cleland; A J Lee; A J McKinley; Fct Smith; G Griffiths; P A Brennan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Introducing standardized "readbacks" to improve patient safety in surgery: a prospective survey in 92 providers at a public safety-net hospital.

Authors:  Hari Prabhakar; Jeffrey B Cooper; Allison Sabel; Sebastian Weckbach; Philip S Mehler; Philip F Stahel
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Survey about the Extubation Practice among Anaesthesiologists in Kosovo.

Authors:  Nehat Baftiu; Islam Krasniqi; Kastriot Haxhirexha; Rudin Domi
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-12

Review 6.  Legal perspectives on black box recording devices in the operating environment.

Authors:  A S H M van Dalen; J Legemaate; W S Schlack; D A Legemate; M P Schijven
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Implementing structured team debriefing using a Black Box in the operating room: surveying team satisfaction.

Authors:  A S H M van Dalen; M Jansen; M van Haperen; S van Dieren; C J Buskens; E J M Nieveen van Dijkum; W A Bemelman; T P Grantcharov; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  WHO Surgical Checklist and Its Practical Application in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Shady Abdel-Rehim; Andrew Morritt; Graeme Perks
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2011-04-27

9.  Surgical training during the COVID-19 pandemic: preparing for future uncertainty.

Authors:  R Ellis; D S G Scrimgeour; P A Brennan
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 1.651

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.