Literature DB >> 20303576

Surgical reconstruction of the male urethral diverticulum.

Hannah H Alphs1, Joshua J Meeks, Jessica T Casey, Chris M Gonzalez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the outcomes and reconstructive techniques used for men with symptomatic urethral diverticula in an attempt to standardize treatment based on the length of the urethral defect after diverticulum excision and the type of repair used. Urethral diverticula are rare in men and may be either congenital or acquired.
METHODS: Between 2003 and 2008, 13 men were treated surgically for symptomatic urethral diverticula at a single institution by a single surgeon (C.M.G.). A total of 6 (46.2%) patients had urethral defects of < 4 cm and underwent excision of the diverticulum with primary anastomosis. Substitution urethroplasty using either penile skin or buccal mucosa was used in 7 (53.8%) patients with urethral defects of >or= 4 cm. Demographic and preoperative characteristics were compared among patients according to the length of the urethral defect.
RESULTS: The mean age of men at the time of surgery was 38.4 years (+/- 13.0; range, 20.4-63.7), with a median follow-up time of 21.7 (+/- 29.0; range, 0.9-84.0) months. Neither age at the time of surgery, length of follow-up, or diverticulum volume was significantly different between men who underwent primary repair vs substitution urethroplasty. The overall success rate was 92% (12/13) with an overall complication rate of 42% at intermediate follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes after excision and primary anastomosis for diverticula associated with defects of < 4 cm were similar to outcomes after diverticulum excision and substitution urethroplasty for defect of >or= 4 cm. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20303576     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

Review 1.  Acquired male urethral diverticulum: a complication following artificial urethral sphincter implantation.

Authors:  João Pedro Peralta; Mário Reis; Carlos Rabaça; Amilcar Sismeiro
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-10-30

2.  Congenital giant male anterior urethral diverticulum with calculi.

Authors:  Mir Reza Kamal; Tarun Jindal; Rajan Kumar Sinha; Dilip Karmakar
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-02-23

3.  Acquired male urethral diverticulum: a rare entity treated in a one-stage procedure.

Authors:  José Carlos Santos; Nidia Rolim; Renato Lains Mota; Hélder Monteiro
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-11-28

4.  Male urethral diverticulum after placement of an artificial urinary sphincter.

Authors:  Eric Laborde; J Christian Winters
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2012

5.  Suspected congenital urethral diverticulum in a dog.

Authors:  Aylin Atilla
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.008

6.  Acquired male urethral diverticula: presentation, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Nadya M Cinman; Jack W McAninch; Allison S Glass; Uwais B Zaid; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  A Case of Urethral Diverticulum with Surgical Repair Using Cadaveric Pericardial Tissue.

Authors:  Loren Custer; Morris Jessop; Stanley Zaslau; Robert Shapiro
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2018-11-04

8.  Urethral diverticulum with urethrocutaneous fistula and giant stone: A case report.

Authors:  Imam Ciptadi Putra; Hendy Mirza
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2019-03-08

9.  Urethroscrotal Fistula: A Rare Cause of Scrotal Swelling.

Authors:  Selcuk Parlak; Aysun E Okay
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.