Literature DB >> 20303200

The recidivism characteristics of an emergency department observation unit.

Michael A Ross1, Robin R Hemphill, Jerome Abramson, Kim Schwab, Carol Clark.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We describe the recidivism characteristics of an adult emergency department (ED) observation unit population and determine whether rates differ according to demographic or clinical features.
METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study of a protocol-driven ED observation unit reviewed all discharged ED observation unit patients who returned within 14 days of discharge for an unscheduled ED visit or direct inpatient admission to the study hospital, or a proximate affiliated hospital, during 6 consecutive months. Age, sex, initial ED observation unit diagnosis, ED observation unit length of stay, and return visit disposition were determined from hospital databases and confirmed by chart review. All return visits were classified as related or unrelated to the index visit.
RESULTS: There were 55,727 ED visits, with 4,348 patients admitted to the ED observation unit, of whom 80.7% (3,509) were discharged. Patients with or without a return visit were similar in terms of age (56.9 years [standard deviation (SD) 19.5 years]), percentage of male patients (40.0%), or initial ED observation unit length of stay (15.0 hours [SD 6.0 hours]). Of discharged ED observation unit patients, 375 (10.8%) had a return visit, of which 277 (7.9%) were related. Of return visits, 86.3% of patients had only 1 return visit, 11.6% had 2, and 2.1% had 3 or more; 4.2% of returns occurred at an affiliated hospital. Time to first return visit was clustered within the first week for related visits, with a mean time to return of 4.5 days (SD 3.9 days). On return visit, 40.2% of patients were treated and discharged from the ED, 36.2% were treated in the ED and admitted, 14.4% were treated in the ED and then the ED observation unit and discharged home, 12.3% were directly admitted to the hospital, and 2.5% were treated in the ED and then the ED observation unit and admitted. Among common conditions, related return visit rates were highest for headache (16.1%), back pain (13.8%), and abdominal pain (12.7%) and lowest for chest pain (3.6%). As a group, therapeutic protocols, and specifically painful conditions, had significantly higher related return visit rates than diagnostic protocols (10.8% versus 5.1%).
CONCLUSION: Patients who return after an ED observation unit visit are similar to patients who do not return in terms of age, sex, or initial length of stay. However, ED observation unit recidivism rates do differ according to observation category, with painful conditions showing the highest recidivism rates. Copyright 2009 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20303200     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  10 in total

Review 1.  Emergency department observation units and the older patient.

Authors:  Mark G Moseley; Miles P Hawley; Jeffrey M Caterino
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.076

2.  Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: The Challenges.

Authors:  Liza Keating; Simon Smith
Journal:  Rev Pain       Date:  2011-09

3.  Unscheduled Return Visits and Leaving the Chest Pain Unit Against Medical Advice.

Authors:  Yaser Jenab; Shima Haghani; Arash Jalali; Farzad Darabi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 0.611

4.  Adverse events in patients with return emergency department visits.

Authors:  Lisa Calder; Anita Pozgay; Shena Riff; David Rothwell; Erik Youngson; Naghmeh Mojaverian; Adam Cwinn; Alan Forster
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Risk factors for recurrent emergency department visits for hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Justin W Yan; Katherine M Gushulak; Melanie P Columbus; Kristine van Aarsen; Alexandra L Hamelin; George A Wells; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07-12

6.  Why seek a second consultation at an emergency centre? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Lize Crafford; Louis S Jenkins
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2017-07-27

7.  Outcomes after observation stays among older adult Medicare beneficiaries in the USA: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kumar Dharmarajan; Li Qin; Maggie Bierlein; Jennie E S Choi; Zhenqiu Lin; Nihar R Desai; Erica S Spatz; Harlan M Krumholz; Arjun K Venkatesh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-06-20

8.  Tapentadol versus tramadol in the management of low back pain in the emergency department: Impact of use on the need for reassessments.

Authors:  Carlos A Guillén-Astete; César Cardona-Carballo; Cristina de la Casa-Resino
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Frequency, Causes, and Outcomes of Return Visits to the Emergency Department Within 72 Hours: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Mohammed Alshahrani; Faisal Katbi; Yazeed Bahamdan; Ahrar Alsaihati; Aisha Alsubaie; Dana Althawadi; Laila Perlas-Asonto
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2020-12-22

10.  Incidence of and Predictors for Early Return Visits to the Emergency Department: A Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Mingchung Ko; Yaling Lee; Chuchieh Chen; Pesus Chou; Dachen Chu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.