Literature DB >> 20303147

Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s).

Stephen B Williams1, Ming-Hui Chen, Anthony V D'Amico, Aaron C Weinberg, Ravi Kacker, Michelle S Hirsch, Jerome P Richie, Jim C Hu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the surgical approach influenced the likelihood of a positive surgical margin (PSM) adjusting for known preoperative predictors of PSM, year of radical prostatectomy, body mass index, use of nerve sparing, and patient age at radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: The study cohort comprised 950 consecutively treated men with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent open radical retropubic (RRP, n = 346) or robotic-assisted (RALP, N = 604) prostatectomy by a single surgeon (J.P.R., J.C.H.) at the Brigham and Women's Hospital from 2005 to 2008 and had complete information on baseline patient and tumor characteristics. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify clinical factors significantly associated with the likelihood of a PSM.
RESULTS: Men undergoing RALP compared with RRP were more likely to have a PSM (adjusted odds ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval: 1.2-3.1, P = .0095). Significant interaction (P = .0085) was noted between the type of surgical approach and whether nerve sparing was performed on the likelihood of a PSM. Specifically, a significantly lower PSM rate was observed for men undergoing nerve sparing and RRP compared with nerve sparing and RALP (7.6% vs 13.5%, P = .007), whereas opposite trend was noted (P = .09) for men undergoing a non-nerve-sparing approach.
CONCLUSIONS: Men undergoing RALP compared with RRP seem to have a greater likelihood of a PSM. Further study is needed to delineate whether this increase is due to an intrinsic limitation of RALP or unknown confounders.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20303147     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  17 in total

Review 1.  Quality of evidence to compare outcomes of open and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Branden Duffey; Briony Varda; Badrinath Konety
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Preoperative characteristics of the P.R.O.S.T.A.T.E. scores: a novel predictive tool for the risk of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ben Xu; Cheng Luo; Qian Zhang; Jie Jin
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy among a nationwide random sample of medicare-age men.

Authors:  Michael J Barry; Patricia M Gallagher; Jonathan S Skinner; Floyd J Fowler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a single cancer center experience.

Authors:  Renato Almeida Rosa de Oliveira; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Thiago Camelo Mourão; Ricardo de Lima Favaretto; Thiago Borges Marques Santana; Ademar Lopes; Stenio de Cassio Zequi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-08

Review 5.  Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiu-Wu Pan; Xin-Ming Cui; Jing-Fei Teng; Dong-Xu Zhang; Zhi-Jun Wang; Fa-Jun Qu; Yi Gao; Xin-Gang Cui; Dan-Feng Xu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  A contemporary analysis of outcomes of adenocarcinoma of the prostate with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer; Jonathan I Epstein; Misop Han; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Robotic surgery in urological oncology: patient care or market share?

Authors:  Deborah R Kaye; Jeffrey K Mullins; H Ballentine Carter; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Predictors of positive surgical margins at open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon series.

Authors:  Mahesha Weerakoon; Shomik Sengupta; Kapil Sethi; Joseph Ischia; David R Webb
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-09-28

9.  Risk Factors for Intraprostatic Incision into Malignant Glands at Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sung-Woo Park; Nathaniel Readal; Byong Chang Jeong; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Misop Han
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy: comparison of the open and robotic approaches for treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.