Literature DB >> 20302913

Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor activity of male Sprague-Dawley rats are not explained by plasma corticosterone levels.

Anna M Nelson1, Melissa J Kleschen, Nancy R Zahniser.   

Abstract

Humans differ in their initial response to, and subsequent abuse of, addictive drugs like cocaine. Rodents also exhibit marked individual differences in responsiveness to cocaine. Previously, we classified male Sprague-Dawley rats as either low or high cocaine responders (LCRs or HCRs, respectively), based on their acute low-dose cocaine-induced locomotor activity, and found that with repeated drug exposure LCRs exhibit greater cocaine locomotor sensitization, reward and reinforcement than HCRs. Differential cocaine-induced increases in striatal dopamine help to explain the LCR/HCR phenotypes. Differential levels of stress and/or anxiety could also contribute but have not been explored. Here we measured open-field activity and plasma corticosterone levels both pre- and post-cocaine treatment in LCRs, HCRs, and saline-treated controls. The three groups did not differ in baseline locomotor activity or corticosterone levels. Importantly, LCR/HCR differences in corticosterone levels were also not observed following acute cocaine (10mg/kg, i.p.), when cocaine induced approximately 3.5-fold greater locomotor activity in HCRs than LCRs. Additionally, there were no LCR/HCR differences in plasma corticosterone levels following 5 days of once-daily cocaine, during which time LCRs developed locomotor sensitization such that their cocaine-induced locomotor activity no longer differed from that of HCRs. Likewise, there were no group activity differences in any of four concentric zones within the open-field chamber. In summary, neither plasma corticosterone levels nor thigmotaxis-type anxiety appears to be a factor that contributes to the observed cocaine-induced LCR/HCR behavioral differences. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20302913      PMCID: PMC2892716          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.03.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  33 in total

1.  From first drug use to drug dependence; developmental periods of risk for dependence upon marijuana, cocaine, and alcohol.

Authors:  Fernando A Wagner; James C Anthony
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Liking and wanting of drug and non-drug rewards in active cocaine users: the STRAP-R questionnaire.

Authors:  R Z Goldstein; P A Woicik; S J Moeller; F Telang; M Jayne; C Wong; G J Wang; J S Fowler; N D Volkow
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 4.153

3.  Neurobiological correlates of individual differences in novelty-seeking behavior in the rat: differential expression of stress-related molecules.

Authors:  M Kabbaj; D P Devine; V R Savage; H Akil
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Selective activation of mesocortical DA system by stress.

Authors:  A M Thierry; J P Tassin; G Blanc; J Glowinski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Pathways to relapse: the neurobiology of drug- and stress-induced relapse to drug-taking.

Authors:  J Stewart
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.186

6.  Enhanced vulnerability to cocaine self-administration is associated with elevated impulse activity of midbrain dopamine neurons.

Authors:  M Marinelli; F J White
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Enhanced motivation to self-administer cocaine is predicted by self-grooming behaviour and relates to dopamine release in the rat medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala.

Authors:  Judith R Homberg; Margot van den Akker; Halfdan S Raasø; George Wardeh; Rob Binnekade; Anton N M Schoffelmeer; Taco J de Vries
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization in low and high cocaine locomotor-responding rats are associated with differential inhibition of dopamine clearance in nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Jilla Sabeti; Greg A Gerhardt; Nancy R Zahniser
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Acute cocaine differentially alters accumbens and striatal dopamine clearance in low and high cocaine locomotor responders: behavioral and electrochemical recordings in freely moving rats.

Authors:  Jilla Sabeti; Greg A Gerhardt; Nancy R Zahniser
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Glucocorticoid receptor immunoreactivity in monoaminergic neurons of rat brain.

Authors:  A Härfstrand; K Fuxe; A Cintra; L F Agnati; I Zini; A C Wikström; S Okret; Z Y Yu; M Goldstein; H Steinbusch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Rats classified as low or high cocaine locomotor responders: a unique model involving striatal dopamine transporters that predicts cocaine addiction-like behaviors.

Authors:  Dorothy J Yamamoto; Anna M Nelson; Bruce H Mandt; Gaynor A Larson; Jacki M Rorabaugh; Christopher M C Ng; Kelsey M Barcomb; Toni L Richards; Richard M Allen; Nancy R Zahniser
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Low- and high-cocaine locomotor responding rats differ in reinstatement of cocaine seeking and striatal mGluR5 protein expression.

Authors:  Diana L Simmons; Bruce H Mandt; Christopher M C Ng; Toni L Richards; Dorothy J Yamamoto; Nancy R Zahniser; Richard M Allen
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Addiction and the adrenal cortex.

Authors:  Gavin P Vinson; Caroline H Brennan
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.335

4.  Effect of the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist RU486 on MK-801 induced behavioural sensitisation.

Authors:  Emilia M Lefevre; Gregory A Medley; Timothy Reeks; Suzy Alexander; Thomas H J Burne; Darryl W Eyles
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.