BACKGROUND:Referrals from rural health centers to urban hospitals join waiting lists as outpatients for hospital admission and hospital treatment. This influences quality of life (QoL) of the rural population and retired people who require medical attention without traveling, provided no risks are involved. For this reason, a rural region of Spain has adopted a strategy to deliver telemedicine (TM) specialized care (Extremadura model) as a political decision. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed at objectively assessing QoL on aspects of health and well-being for citizens benefiting from this system. METHODS: We performed a randomized study of 800 primary care patients referred for specialized care: 420 regular face-to-face hospital referrals and 380 referred to a hospital specialist at a distance by TM. The study used two questionnaires: a modified version of the classical SF-12v2 short form questionnaire for health and well-being and a specific author-elaborated questionnaire. The latter focused on major patient concerns such as (1) discomfort and pain relief, (2) swift diagnosis, (3) swift treatment, (4) swift decision on hospital admission or not, (5) avoidance of traveling, (6) avoidance of red tape, and (7) personal attention. QoL was assessed twice: before referral to a hospital specialist and 6 months after referral to the same. The results were statistically compared. RESULTS: Both groups showed comparable health status with added advantages for TM referrals such as (1) less traveling (p = 0.0001) and (2) faster diagnosis, health examination, and treatment (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION:Telemedicine care by a hospital specialist through videoconferencing was comparable to hospital referral for face-to-face medicine. Teleconsultations managed by nurses had a positive impact on the QoL of rural patients. They did not have to travel and thus diagnoses and examinations to start treatment were initiated faster.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Referrals from rural health centers to urban hospitals join waiting lists as outpatients for hospital admission and hospital treatment. This influences quality of life (QoL) of the rural population and retired people who require medical attention without traveling, provided no risks are involved. For this reason, a rural region of Spain has adopted a strategy to deliver telemedicine (TM) specialized care (Extremadura model) as a political decision. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed at objectively assessing QoL on aspects of health and well-being for citizens benefiting from this system. METHODS: We performed a randomized study of 800 primary care patients referred for specialized care: 420 regular face-to-face hospital referrals and 380 referred to a hospital specialist at a distance by TM. The study used two questionnaires: a modified version of the classical SF-12v2 short form questionnaire for health and well-being and a specific author-elaborated questionnaire. The latter focused on major patient concerns such as (1) discomfort and pain relief, (2) swift diagnosis, (3) swift treatment, (4) swift decision on hospital admission or not, (5) avoidance of traveling, (6) avoidance of red tape, and (7) personal attention. QoL was assessed twice: before referral to a hospital specialist and 6 months after referral to the same. The results were statistically compared. RESULTS: Both groups showed comparable health status with added advantages for TM referrals such as (1) less traveling (p = 0.0001) and (2) faster diagnosis, health examination, and treatment (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Telemedicine care by a hospital specialist through videoconferencing was comparable to hospital referral for face-to-face medicine. Teleconsultations managed by nurses had a positive impact on the QoL of rural patients. They did not have to travel and thus diagnoses and examinations to start treatment were initiated faster.
Authors: Meredith A Achey; Christopher A Beck; Denise B Beran; Cynthia M Boyd; Peter N Schmidt; Allison W Willis; Sara S Riggare; Richard B Simone; Kevin M Biglan; E Ray Dorsey Journal: Trials Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: E Ray Dorsey; Kristin C Darwin; Samara Mohammed; Sean Donohue; Alyssa Tethal; Meredith A Achey; Susan Ward; Elaine Caughey; Emily D Conley; Nicholas Eriksson; Bernard Ravina Journal: Digit Health Date: 2015-06-29
Authors: Meredith A Achey; Christopher A Beck; Denise B Beran; Cynthia M Boyd; Peter N Schmidt; Allison W Willis; Sara S Riggare; Richard B Simone; Kevin M Biglan; E Ray Dorsey Journal: Trials Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 2.279