Literature DB >> 20302306

Molecular basis for enantioselectivity in the (R)- and (S)-hydroxypropylthioethanesulfonate dehydrogenases, a unique pair of stereoselective short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases involved in aliphatic epoxide carboxylation.

Dariusz A Sliwa1, Arathi M Krishnakumar, John W Peters, Scott A Ensign.   

Abstract

(R)- and (S)-2-hydroxypropyl-CoM (R-HPC and S-HPC) are produced as intermediates in bacterial propylene metabolism from the nucleophilic addition of coenzyme M to (R)- and (S)-epoxypropane, respectively. Two highly enantioselective dehydrogenases (R-HPCDH and S-HPCDH) belonging to the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family catalyze the conversion of R-HPC and S-HPC to 2-ketopropyl-CoM (2-KPC), which undergoes reductive cleavage and carboxylation to produce acetoacetate. In the present study, one of three copies of S-HPCDH enzymes present on a linear megaplasmid in Xanthobacter autotrophicus strain Py2 has been cloned and overexpressed, allowing the first detailed side by side characterization of the R-HPCDH and S-HPCDH enzymes. The catalytic triad of S-HPCDH was found to consist of Y156, K160, and S143. R211 and K214 were identified as the amino acid residues coordinating the sulfonate of CoM in S-HPC. R211A and K214A mutants were severely impaired in the oxidation of S-HPC or reduction of 2-KPC but were largely unaffected in the oxidation and reduction of aliphatic alcohols and ketones. Kinetic analyses using R- and S-HPC as substrates revealed that enantioselectivity in R-HPCDH (value, 944) was dictated largely by differences in k(cat) while enantioselectivity for S-HPCDH (value, 1315) was dictated largely by changes in K(m). S-HPCDH had an inherent high enantioselectivity for producing (S)-2-butanol from 2-butanone that was unaffected by modulators that interact with the sulfonate binding site. The tertiary alcohol 2-methyl-2-hydroxypropyl-CoM (M-HPC) was a competitive inhibitor of R-HPCDH-catalyzed R-HPC oxidation, with a K(is) similar to the K(m) for R-HPC, but was not an inhibitor of S-HPCDH. The primary alcohol 2-hydroxyethyl-CoM was a substrate for both R-HPCDH and S-HPCDH with identical K(m) values. The pH dependence of kinetic parameters suggests that the hydroxyl group is a larger contributor to S-HPC binding to S-HPCDH than for R-HPC binding to R-HPCDH. It is proposed that active site constraints within the S-HPCDH prevent proper binding of R-HPC and M-HPC due to steric clashes with the improperly aligned methyl group on the C2 carbon, resulting in a different mechanism for controlling substrate specificity and enantioselectivity than present in the R-HPCDH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20302306      PMCID: PMC2858264          DOI: 10.1021/bi100294m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  25 in total

Review 1.  Microbial metabolism of aliphatic alkenes.

Authors:  S A Ensign
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Evidence that a linear megaplasmid encodes enzymes of aliphatic alkene and epoxide metabolism and coenzyme M (2-mercaptoethanesulfonate) biosynthesis in Xanthobacter strain Py2.

Authors:  J G Krum; S A Ensign
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  The catalytic triad in Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase: pH, temperature and molecular modelling studies.

Authors:  J O Winberg; M K Brendskag; I Sylte; R I Lindstad; J S McKinley-McKee
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-11-26       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Drosophila lebanonensis alcohol dehydrogenase: pH dependence of the kinetic coefficients.

Authors:  M Kaaber Brendskag; J S McKinley-McKee; J O Winberg
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1999-04-12

6.  Characterization of the 2-[(R)-2-hydroxypropylthio]ethanesulfonate dehydrogenase from Xanthobacter strain Py2: product inhibition, pH dependence of kinetic parameters, site-directed mutagenesis, rapid equilibrium inhibition, and chemical modification.

Authors:  Daniel D Clark; Scott A Ensign
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 7.  Short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (SDR): the 2002 update.

Authors:  Udo Oppermann; Charlotta Filling; Malin Hult; Naeem Shafqat; Xiaoqiu Wu; Monica Lindh; Jawed Shafqat; Erik Nordling; Yvonne Kallberg; Bengt Persson; Hans Jörnvall
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 5.192

Review 8.  Recent advances in the biocatalytic reduction of ketones and oxidation of sec-alcohols.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kroutil; Harald Mang; Klaus Edegger; Kurt Faber
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  The stereoselectivity and catalytic properties of Xanthobacter autotrophicus 2-[(R)-2-Hydroxypropylthio]ethanesulfonate dehydrogenase are controlled by interactions between C-terminal arginine residues and the sulfonate of coenzyme M.

Authors:  Daniel D Clark; Jeffrey M Boyd; Scott A Ensign
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 10.  Aliphatic epoxide carboxylation.

Authors:  Scott A Ensign; Jeffrey R Allen
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2003-01-08       Impact factor: 23.643

View more
  3 in total

1.  Roles of the redox-active disulfide and histidine residues forming a catalytic dyad in reactions catalyzed by 2-ketopropyl coenzyme M oxidoreductase/carboxylase.

Authors:  Melissa A Kofoed; David A Wampler; Arti S Pandey; John W Peters; Scott A Ensign
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Metabolism of 2-methylpropene (isobutylene) by the aerobic bacterium Mycobacterium sp. strain ELW1.

Authors:  Samanthi Kottegoda; Elizabeth Waligora; Michael Hyman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Hydroxynitrile lyases with α/β-hydrolase fold: two enzymes with almost identical 3D structures but opposite enantioselectivities and different reaction mechanisms.

Authors:  Jennifer N Andexer; Nicole Staunig; Thorsten Eggert; Christoph Kratky; Martina Pohl; Karl Gruber
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.164

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.