Literature DB >> 20301846

Deciphering faces: quantifiable visual cues to weight.

Vinet Coetzee1, Jingying Chen, David I Perrett, Ian D Stephen.   

Abstract

Body weight plays a crucial role in mate choice, as weight is related to both attractiveness and health. People are quite accurate at judging weight in faces, but the cues used to make these judgments have not been defined. This study consisted of two parts. First, we wanted to identify quantifiable facial cues that are related to body weight, as defined by body mass index (BMI). Second, we wanted to test whether people use these cues to judge weight. In study 1, we recruited two groups of Caucasian and two groups of African participants, determined their BMI and measured their 2-D facial images for: width-to-height ratio, perimeter-to-area ratio, and cheek-to-jaw-width ratio. All three measures were significantly related to BMI in males, while the width-to-height and cheek-to-jaw-width ratios were significantly related to BMI in females. In study 2, these images were rated for perceived weight by Caucasian observers. We showed that these observers use all three cues to judge weight in African and Caucasian faces of both sexes. These three facial cues, width-to-height ratio, perimeter-to-area ratio, and cheek-to-jaw-width ratio, are therefore not only related to actual weight but provide a basis for perceptual attributes as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20301846     DOI: 10.1068/p6560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  33 in total

1.  Appealing to vanity: could potential appearance improvement motivate fruit and vegetable consumption?

Authors:  Ross D Whitehead; Gozde Ozakinci; Ian D Stephen; David I Perrett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Reassessing the association between facial structure and baseball performance: a comment on Tsujimura & Banissy (2013).

Authors:  William J Mayew
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not.

Authors:  Carmen E Lefevre; Peter J Etchells; Emma C Howell; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Perception of health from facial cues.

Authors:  Audrey J Henderson; Iris J Holzleitner; Sean N Talamas; David I Perrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Brief Report: Facial Asymmetry and Autistic-Like Traits in the General Population.

Authors:  Maryam Boutrus; Zulqarnain Gilani; Murray T Maybery; Gail A Alvares; Diana W Tan; Peter R Eastwood; Ajmal Mian; Andrew J O Whitehouse
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-06

6.  On the perception of religious group membership from faces.

Authors:  Nicholas O Rule; James V Garrett; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Body mass index and facial cues in sasang typology for young and elderly persons.

Authors:  Duong Duc Pham; Jun-Hyeong Do; Boncho Ku; Hae Jung Lee; Honggie Kim; Jong Yeol Kim
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 8.  Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat.

Authors:  Shawn N Geniole; Thomas F Denson; Barnaby J Dixson; Justin M Carré; Cheryl M McCormick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Facial Features: What Women Perceive as Attractive and What Men Consider Attractive.

Authors:  José Antonio Muñoz-Reyes; Marta Iglesias-Julios; Miguel Pita; Enrique Turiegano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A lack of sexual dimorphism in width-to-height ratio in white European faces using 2D photographs, 3D scans, and anthropometry.

Authors:  Robin S S Kramer; Alex L Jones; Robert Ward
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.