Literature DB >> 20301845

The effect of cognitive distraction on saccadic latency.

Jane Halliday1, Roger H S Carpenter.   

Abstract

Saccadic initiation is increasingly being studied as a surrogate for more general neural mechanisms of decision-making. Visual 'decision-making' is thought to be controlled by higher cortical functions. Lower areas such as the superior colliculus are thought to be involved with more primitive optomotor reflexes that can generate short-latency saccades. It is now well established that imposition of fronto-executive load on subjects performing a saccadic task which, in particular, involves suppression of saccades (the no-go saccadic task), increases the number of errors made. It is theorised that a weakening of cortical control of the superior colliculus is responsible for the increase in error rate. One way to test this theory is to measure the latency of incorrect saccades made in a no-go saccadic task in relation to error rate under different conditions of fronto-executive load. A high error rate combined with an increased number of short-latency saccades in the range of express or early saccades would indicate that subjects have an inability to inhibit these short-latency more reflexive saccades, which seem to originate in the superior colliculus. Hence the normal cortical control of the superior colliculus is weakened. We used a saccadic go/no-go task under fronto-executive load and found that the proportion of short-latency saccades increased with audio-verbal interference, in conjunction with an increase in error rate. These findings provide strong empirical evidence to support the theory that maintenance of cortical functions is key to the control of saccadic responses. Under conditions of fronto-executive loading such cortical control is weakened, leaving subjects with a reduced ability to inhibit short-latency more reflexive saccades.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20301845     DOI: 10.1068/p6547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  8 in total

1.  Real and implied motion at the center of gaze.

Authors:  Alper Açik; Andreas Bartel; Peter König
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Working memory retrieval as a decision process.

Authors:  Benjamin Pearson; Julius Raskevicius; Paul M Bays; Yoni Pertzov; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The influence of attention and target identification on saccadic eye movements depends on prior target location.

Authors:  David R Hardwick; Timothy R H Cutmore; Trevor J Hine
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Saccadic Eye Movement Abnormalities in Children with Epilepsy.

Authors:  Judith Lunn; Tim Donovan; Damien Litchfield; Charlie Lewis; Robert Davies; Trevor Crawford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Influence of Coactors on Saccadic and Manual Responses.

Authors:  Manuel Oliva; Diederick C Niehorster; Halszka Jarodzka; Kenneth Holmqvist
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-02-01

6.  Saccadic reaction time and ocular findings in phenylketonuria.

Authors:  Susanne Hopf; Caroline Nowak; Julia B Hennermann; Irene Schmidtmann; Norbert Pfeiffer; Susanne Pitz
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.123

7.  Post-saccadic Eye Movement Indices Under Cognitive Load: A Path Analysis to Determine Visual Performance.

Authors:  Marzieh Salehi Fadardi; Javad Salehi Fadardi; Monireh Mahjoob; Hassan Doosti
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2022-08-15

Review 8.  LATER models of neural decision behavior in choice tasks.

Authors:  Imran Noorani
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.