Literature DB >> 2030180

Have all won and must all have prizes? Revisiting Luborsky et al.'s verdict.

L E Beutler1.   

Abstract

Although most reviews of comparative psychotherapy literature have failed to find significant differences among treatments, it is premature to give up the search for differential effects. There are a large number of patient, therapist, and treatment variables that may mediate the effects of treatments. Given the enormity of the task of exploring potential interactions among the many patient, therapist, and psychotherapy types, a guiding model is needed by which to narrow our search for variables that mediate between treatment type and outcome. However, theoretical constructs that represent both patient and therapy variations frequently are poorly defined. Tests of treatment selection models that cut across narrow theoretical differences among psychotherapies and that operationalize definitions of patient types hold promise for revealing meaningful Patient x Therapist interaction effects in psychotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2030180     DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.2.226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  3 in total

Review 1.  Psychotherapy research: new findings and implications for training and practice.

Authors:  P Høglend
Journal:  J Psychother Pract Res       Date:  1999

2.  A randomized prospective study comparing supportive and dynamic therapies. Outcome and alliance.

Authors:  D J Hellerstein; R N Rosenthal; H Pinsker; L W Samstag; J C Muran; A Winston
Journal:  J Psychother Pract Res       Date:  1998

3.  The relationship between expected engagement and talking therapy outcome.

Authors:  Phillippa Harrison; Gillian E Hardy; Michael Barkham
Journal:  Clin Psychol Psychother       Date:  2019-06-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.