Literature DB >> 20300310

Perioperative fracture-dislocation of the humeral head during a resurfacing hemiarthroplasty.

L Peidro1, R Plaza, S Sastre.   

Abstract

We report a case of perioperative fracture-dislocation of the humeral head produced during the reaming for a resurfacing replacement hemiarthroplasty (RRH) in a 79-year old woman. This is a surgical complication not previously described in the literature for this type of prosthesis design. Resurfacing humeral head implant has been noted as a useful treatment for glenohumeral arthropathies, also in elderly people, with a very low incidence of complications. However, as we report, they are possible.It is advisable that conventional stemmed implants could be available when RRH is performed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Perioperative fracture; reaming; resurfacing humeral head; shoulder prosthesis

Year:  2008        PMID: 20300310      PMCID: PMC2840816          DOI: 10.4103/0973-6042.41036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg        ISSN: 0973-6042


INTRODUCTION

Indications for a humeral resurfacing replacement hemiarthroplasty (RRH) are similar to those for stemmed hemiarthroplasty, including osteoarthritis with concentric erosion and ruptured rotator cuff in elderly people. The aim of this article is to describe a perioperative fracture of the humeral head, which has not been reported before. We believe that this complication should be considered when RRH is used in elderly people.

CASE REPORT

A 79- year- old woman with a history of severe cardiac insufficiency presented at our outpatient clinic with continuous bilateral shoulder pain and functional impairement of left predominance. Plain radiographs showed extensive osteoarthritis of both shoulders with reduced subacromial space [Figure 1]. We proposed a Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis but due to her very high surgical risk, finally, we decided to change to a Resurfacing Hemiarthroplasty. This procedure was initially performed with a Resurfacing Humeral Head implant (Global C.A.P..™., De Puy Orthopaedics), which had been recently introduced in our hospital. The reamer was new and the process was done in reaming speed as usual, after all the osteophytes had been excised. During this process, a sudden two-part anatomical neck fracture-dislocation of the humeral head occurred [Figure 2]. This complication has never been described for this surgical technique. Obviously, the resurfacing procedure was ruled out and a conventional modular stemmed hemiarthroplasty was placed uneventfully without worsening of the patient medical conditions.
Figure 1

Preoperative X-ray showing osteoarthritis of the shoulder

Figure 2

Fractured humeral head fragment

Preoperative X-ray showing osteoarthritis of the shoulder Fractured humeral head fragment

DISSCUSION

According to Copeland, indications for a (RRH) are similar to those for stemmed hemiarthroplasty, including osteoarthritis with concentric erosion and ruptured rotator cuff in elderly people as in our case.[1] Mean age of the patients treated with a Copeland Resurfacing Prosthesis was 68 years and it also included the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.[2-4] Clinical experience with the Copeland cementless surface resurfacing arthroplasty (CSRA, Biomet) overcomes 20 years and a perioperative humeral head fracture-dislocation has not been reported with this implant. The surgical experience with other resurfacing implants is limited but this complication has not been published either.[56] However, indications concerning the Global C.A.P. design are specially directed to osteoarthritis in young people, its results have not been published and its overall experience is short. In fact, it was our sixth case with this prosthesis, although the main surgeon experience on shoulder arthroplasties is quite long (since 1991). We can attribute this complication to the osteopenic bone of the patient, but also to an excessive reaming (possibly and excessive strength was applied) or to the characteristics of the humeral head shaper design, that could be more aggressive that the Copeland's one [Figure 3]. Therefore, in order to avoid our perioperative complication, we suggest that a very cautious reaming of the humeral head must be done when a Resurfacing humeral head is implanted. Nevertheless, this prosthesis could be a useful treatment, also in elderly people. However, it is advisable that conventional stemmed implants should be available in the case that a RRH is performed.
Figure 3

Global CAP sharper

Global CAP sharper
  6 in total

1.  The continuing development of shoulder replacement: "reaching the surface".

Authors:  Stephen Copeland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Outcome of Copeland surface replacement shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Simon R Thomas; Adrian J Wilson; Andrew Chambler; Ian Harding; Michael Thomas
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder. 5- to 10-year results with the Copeland mark-2 prosthesis.

Authors:  O Levy; S A Copeland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

4.  Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (Copeland CSRA) for osteoarthritis of the shoulder.

Authors:  Ofer Levy; Stephen A Copeland
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Copeland surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Ofer Levy; Lennard Funk; Giuseppe Sforza; Stephen A Copeland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Cup arthroplasty of the rheumatoid shoulder.

Authors:  E Jónsson; N Egund; I Kelly; U Rydholm; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1986-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.