Literature DB >> 20300020

The metabolic costs of reciprocal supersets vs. traditional resistance exercise in young recreationally active adults.

Andrew R Kelleher1, Kyle J Hackney, Timothy J Fairchild, Stefan Keslacy, Lori L Ploutz-Snyder.   

Abstract

An acute bout of traditional resistance training (TRAD) increases energy expenditure (EE) both during exercise and in the postexercise period. Reciprocal supersets (SUPERs) are a method of resistance training that alternates multiple sets of high-intensity agonist-antagonist muscle groups with limited recovery. The purpose of this study was to compare the energy cost of SUPERs and TRAD both during and in the postexercise period. We hypothesized that SUPERs would produce greater exercise EE relative to the duration of exercise time and greater excess postexercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) than TRAD of matched work. Ten recreationally active, young men each participated in 2 exercise protocols: SUPER, followed 1 week later by TRAD matched within using a 10-repetition maximum load for 6 exercises, 4 sets, and repetitions. Participants were measured for oxygen consumption and blood lactate concentration during exercise and 60 minutes postexercise after each exercise bout. No significant differences were observed in aerobic exercise EE between trials (SUPER 1,009.99 +/- 71.42 kJ; TRAD 954.49 +/- 83.31 kJ); however, when expressed relative to time, the exercise EE was significantly greater during SUPER (34.70 +/- 2.97 kJ.min) than TRAD (26.28 +/- 2.43 kJ.min). Excess postexercise oxygen consumption was significantly greater after SUPER (79.36 +/- 7.49 kJ) over TRAD (59.67 +/- 8.37 kJ). Average blood lactate measures were significantly greater during SUPER (5.1 +/- 0.9 mmol.L) than during TRAD (3.8 +/- 0.6 mmol.L). Reciprocal supersets produced greater exercise kJ.min, blood lactate, and EPOC than did TRAD. Incorporating this method of resistance exercise may benefit exercisers attempting to increase EE and have a fixed exercise volume with limited exercise time available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20300020     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d3e993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  9 in total

1.  Tri-Set Training System Induces a High Muscle Swelling with Short Time Commitment in Resistance-Trained Subjects: A Cross-Over Study.

Authors:  Júlio B B DE Camargo; Rafael S Zaroni; Antônio C T Júnior; Thiago P DE Oliveira; Thiago B Trindade; Charles R Lopes; Felipe A Brigatto
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2022-04-01

2.  Exercise order affects the total training volume and the ratings of perceived exertion in response to a super-set resistance training session.

Authors:  Sandor Balsamo; Ramires Alsamir Tibana; Dahan da Cunha Nascimento; Gleyverton Landim de Farias; Zeno Petruccelli; Frederico Dos Santos de Santana; Otávio Vanni Martins; Fernando de Aguiar; Guilherme Borges Pereira; Jéssica Cardoso de Souza; Jonato Prestes
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2012-02-10

3.  The effects of traditional, superset, and tri-set resistance training structures on perceived intensity and physiological responses.

Authors:  Jonathon J S Weakley; Kevin Till; Dale B Read; Gregory A B Roe; Joshua Darrall-Jones; Padraic J Phibbs; Ben Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Metabolic effects of two high-intensity circuit training protocols: Does sequence matter?

Authors:  Tony P Nuñez; Fabiano T Amorim; Nicholas M Beltz; Christine M Mermier; Terence A Moriarty; Roberto C Nava; Trisha A VanDusseldorp; Len Kravitz
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.103

5.  Maximizing Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review of Advanced Resistance Training Techniques and Methods.

Authors:  Michal Krzysztofik; Michal Wilk; Grzegorz Wojdała; Artur Gołaś
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Resistance Exercise Intensity Does Not Influence Neurotrophic Factors Response in Equated Volume Schemes.

Authors:  Leandro Lodo; Alexandre Moreira; Reury Frank P Bacurau; Carol D Capitani; Wesley P Barbosa; Marcelo Massa; Brad J Schoenfeld; Marcelo S Aoki
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  Acute Behavior of Oxygen Consumption, Lactate Concentrations, and Energy Expenditure During Resistance Training: Comparisons Among Three Intensities.

Authors:  Gustavo A João; Gustavo P L Almeida; Lucas D Tavares; Carlos Augusto Kalva-Filho; Nelson Carvas Junior; Francisco L Pontes; Julien S Baker; Danilo S Bocalini; Aylton J Figueira
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-12-15

8.  Hypotensive Responses of Reciprocal Supersets versus Traditional Resistance Training in Apparently Healthy Men.

Authors:  Claudio M Bentes; Pablo B Costa; Victor G Corrêa Neto; Roberto Simão; Gabriel A Paz; Marianna F Maia; Tiago Figueiredo; Gabriel R Neto; Jefferson S Novaes; Humberto Miranda
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2017-05-01

9.  Acute low- compared to high-load resistance training to failure results in greater energy expenditure during exercise in healthy young men.

Authors:  Diego T Brunelli; Enrico A R Finardi; Ivan L P Bonfante; Arthur F Gáspari; Amanda V Sardeli; Thiago M F Souza; Mara P T Chacon-Mikahil; Claudia R Cavaglieri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.