Literature DB >> 20299789

Difference in infarct volume and patterns between cardioembolism and internal carotid artery disease: focus on the degree of cardioembolic risk and carotid stenosis.

Jin-Man Jung1, Sun U Kwon, Jae-Hong Lee, Dong-Wha Kang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Infarct volume and patterns may vary according to the stroke subtype. Within each stroke subtype, however, it is not clear if the infarct volume and patterns are affected by the risk of cardioembolism (CE) and the degree of arterial stenosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included consecutive patients with acute symptomatic ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) performed within 48 h of symptom onset who had CE or internal carotid artery disease (ICAD). CE was divided into high-risk and medium-risk groups, and ICAD was divided into ICA occlusion (ICAO) and ICA stenosis (ICAS > or =50%) groups. DWI lesion patterns were classified as single versus multiple, and as large territorial versus perforating artery (large > or =2 cm, small <2 cm) versus pial artery versus border zone infarct. Infarct volumes and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were obtained.
RESULTS: Of the 167 patients included, 120 had CE (98 high-risk, 22 medium-risk) and 47 had ICAD (25 ICAO, 22 ICAS). The infarct volume was largest in the high-risk CE group, followed by the ICAO group. The infarct volumes in the medium-risk CE and ICAS groups were similar. Infarct volumes correlated with NIHSS scores. Single and large territorial infarcts were more common in the high-risk CE group, while multiple lesions as well as pial and border zone infarcts were more frequent in the ICAD subgroups. The lesion patterns of the medium-risk CE and ICAD groups were relatively similar.
CONCLUSIONS: CE and ICAD have heterogeneous radiologic characteristics depending on the risk of embolism and the degree of carotid stenosis. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20299789     DOI: 10.1159/000297965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1015-9770            Impact factor:   2.762


  7 in total

1.  Infarct patterns, collaterals and likely causative mechanisms of stroke in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Elena López-Cancio; Maria Gisele Matheus; Jose G Romano; David S Liebeskind; Shyam Prabhakaran; Tanya N Turan; George A Cotsonis; Michael J Lynn; Zoran Rumboldt; Marc I Chimowitz
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging in acute ischemic stroke treatment.

Authors:  Bum Joon Kim; Hyun Goo Kang; Hye-Jin Kim; Sung-Ho Ahn; Na Young Kim; Steven Warach; Dong-Wha Kang
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 6.967

3.  Relation of infarction location and volume to vertigo in vertebrobasilar stroke.

Authors:  Ahmed Mohamed Elhfnawy; Mervat Abd El-Raouf; Jens Volkmann; Felix Fluri; Doaa Elsalamawy
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Associations between cerebral magnetic resonance imaging infarct volume and acute ischemic stroke etiology.

Authors:  Nicholas Omid Daneshvari; Michelle Christina Johansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Analysis of Risk Factors for Poor Short-Term Outcomes in Acute Cardioembolic Stroke Patients without Reperfusion Therapy.

Authors:  Yikun Guo; Min Zhang; Yan Su; Jianfang Liu; Hongran Fu; Qian Wang; Yun Chen
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.570

6.  Identification of magnetic resonance imaging features for the prediction of unrecognized atrial fibrillation in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Chao-Hui Chen; Meng Lee; Hsu-Huei Weng; Jiann-Der Lee; Jen-Tsung Yang; Yuan-Hsiung Tsai; Yen-Chu Huang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Severe Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in Cardioembolic Stroke.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Feina Shi; Zhicai Chen; Shenqiang Yan; Xinfa Ding; Min Lou
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.