Literature DB >> 20298926

Effect of cyclosporine on left ventricular remodeling after reperfused myocardial infarction.

Nathan Mewton1, Pierre Croisille1, Gerald Gahide2, Gilles Rioufol3, Eric Bonnefoy1, Ingrid Sanchez1, Thien Tri Cung4, Catherine Sportouch4, Denis Angoulvant3, Gérard Finet3, Xavier André-Fouët3, Geneviève Derumeaux3, Christophe Piot4, Hélène Vernhet4, Didier Revel1, Michel Ovize5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effect of a single dose of cyclosporine administered at the time of reperfusion on left ventricular (LV) remodeling and function by cardiac magnetic resonance 5 days and 6 months after myocardial infarction.
BACKGROUND: In a human study, administration of cyclosporine at the time of acute reperfusion was associated with a smaller infarct size.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients of the original cyclosporine study had an acute (at 5 days) and a follow-up (at 6 months) cardiac magnetic resonance study to determine LV volumes, mass, ejection fraction, myocardial wall thickness in infarcted and remote noninfarcted myocardium, and infarct size.
RESULTS: There was a persistent reduction in infarct size at 6 months in the cyclosporine group compared with the control group of patients (29 +/- 15 g vs. 38 +/- 14 g; p = 0.04). There was a significant reduction of LV end-systolic volume (and a trend for LV end-diastolic volume; p = 0.07) in the cyclosporine group compared with the control group, both at 5 days and 6 months after infarction. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in either global LV mass or regional wall thickness of the remote noninfarcted myocardium at 5 days or 6 months. Attenuation of LV dilation and improvement of LV ejection fraction by cyclosporine at 6 months were correlated with infarct size reduction.
CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine used at the moment of acute myocardial infarction reperfusion persistently reduces infarct size and does not have a detrimental effect on LV remodeling. These results are preliminary and must be supported by further studies. (Ciclosporin A and Acute Myocardial Infarction; NCT00403728). Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20298926     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  55 in total

1.  Cyclosporine after MI.

Authors:  Alexandra King
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Catch me if you can: targeting the mitochondrial permeability transition pore in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A Linkermann; K Konstantinidis; R N Kitsis
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 3.  Novelties in pharmacological management of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.687

Review 4.  Mechanisms of cell death in heart disease.

Authors:  Klitos Konstantinidis; Russell S Whelan; Richard N Kitsis
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 8.311

5.  Autophagy, apoptosis, and mitochondria: molecular integration and physiological relevance in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Darin Bloemberg; Joe Quadrilatero
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.249

Review 6.  Practical guidelines for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical and clinical studies on cardioprotection.

Authors:  Hans Erik Bøtker; Derek Hausenloy; Ioanna Andreadou; Salvatore Antonucci; Kerstin Boengler; Sean M Davidson; Soni Deshwal; Yvan Devaux; Fabio Di Lisa; Moises Di Sante; Panagiotis Efentakis; Saveria Femminò; David García-Dorado; Zoltán Giricz; Borja Ibanez; Efstathios Iliodromitis; Nina Kaludercic; Petra Kleinbongard; Markus Neuhäuser; Michel Ovize; Pasquale Pagliaro; Michael Rahbek-Schmidt; Marisol Ruiz-Meana; Klaus-Dieter Schlüter; Rainer Schulz; Andreas Skyschally; Catherine Wilder; Derek M Yellon; Peter Ferdinandy; Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 17.165

7.  Intralipid, a clinically safe compound, protects the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury more efficiently than cyclosporine-A.

Authors:  Jingyuan Li; Andrea Iorga; Salil Sharma; Ji-Youn Youn; Rod Partow-Navid; Soban Umar; Hua Cai; Siamak Rahman; Mansoureh Eghbali
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 8.  Immunological aspects of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  S Garrido-Urbani; M Meguenani; F Montecucco; B A Imhof
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 9.623

9.  The NHLBI-sponsored Consortium for preclinicAl assESsment of cARdioprotective therapies (CAESAR): a new paradigm for rigorous, accurate, and reproducible evaluation of putative infarct-sparing interventions in mice, rabbits, and pigs.

Authors:  Steven P Jones; Xian-Liang Tang; Yiru Guo; Charles Steenbergen; David J Lefer; Rakesh C Kukreja; Maiying Kong; Qianhong Li; Shashi Bhushan; Xiaoping Zhu; Junjie Du; Yibing Nong; Heather L Stowers; Kazuhisa Kondo; Gregory N Hunt; Traci T Goodchild; Adam Orr; Carlos C Chang; Ramzi Ockaili; Fadi N Salloum; Roberto Bolli
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 10.  Mitochondria as a drug target in ischemic heart disease and cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Andrew M Walters; George A Porter; Paul S Brookes
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 17.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.