Literature DB >> 20298873

Comparative study of the adsorption performance of a multi-sorbent bed (Carbotrap, Carbopack X, Carboxen 569) and a Tenax TA adsorbent tube for the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

E Gallego1, F J Roca, J F Perales, X Guardino.   

Abstract

A comparison between two types of adsorbent tubes, the commonly used Tenax TA and a multi-sorbent bed (Carbotrap, Carbopack X, Carboxen 569) tube developed in our laboratory, has been done to evaluate their usefulness in the analysis of VOCs in ambient air. Duplicate indoor and outdoor samples of Tenax TA and multi-sorbent tubes of 10, 20, 40, 60 and 90l were taken in Barcelona city (Spain) on July and October of 2009. Breakthrough values (defined as %VOCs found in the back tube) were determined for all sampling volumes connecting two sampling tubes in series. The analysis was performed by automatic thermal desorption (ATD) coupled with capillary gas chromatography (GC)/mass spectrometry detector (MSD). Significant differences between the concentrations obtained-from multi-sorbent bed and Tenax TA tubes are observed for the very volatile compounds (56 degrees C<boiling point<100 degrees C and 4kPa<vapour pressure (20 degrees C)<47kPa) (e.g. acetone, isopropanol, n-hexane) and for alcohols and chlorinated compounds (e.g. 1-butanol, carbon disulphide, dichloromethane, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene), being the concentrations found higher in multi-sorbent bed than in Tenax TA tubes. On the other hand, mainly all compounds with boiling points higher than 100 degrees C (except alpha-pinene, chlorinated and polar compounds) do not show significant differences between the obtained multi-sorbent bed and Tenax TA tube concentrations. For the concentrations obtained (5ppt to 100ppb), Tenax TA present high breakthrough values (from 0 to 77%) for mainly all compounds and sampling volumes studied. On the other hand, multi-sorbent bed tubes do not exhibit important breakthrough values for these compounds, except the VVOCs ethanol (for all sampled volumes), and acetone, dichloromethane and isopropanol (for sampling volumes over 40l). The concentration differences observed between Tenax TA and multi-sorbent bed tubes are directly related to the high breakthrough values determined for Tenax TA adsorbent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20298873     DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Talanta        ISSN: 0039-9140            Impact factor:   6.057


  11 in total

Review 1.  Potential Applications and Limitations of Electronic Nose Devices for Plant Disease Diagnosis.

Authors:  Antonio Cellini; Sonia Blasioli; Enrico Biondi; Assunta Bertaccini; Ilaria Braschi; Francesco Spinelli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Utilization of rice husk silica as adsorbent for BTEX passive air sampler under high humidity condition.

Authors:  Thanita Areerob; Nurak Grisdanurak; Siriluk Chiarakorn
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air at Four Residential Locations in Seoul, Korea.

Authors:  Ki-Hyun Kim; Duy Xuan Ho; Chan Goo Park; Chang-Jin Ma; Sudhir Kumar Pandey; Sung Chun Lee; Ho Jin Jeong; Soon Hee Lee
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.907

4.  Preparation of Carbotrap/silica composite for needle trap field sampling of halogenated volatile organic compounds followed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry determination.

Authors:  Ali Poormohammadi; Abdulrahman Bahrami; Alireza Ghiasvand; Farshid Ghorbani Shahna; Maryam Farhadian
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2019-12-05

5.  A novel quantitation approach for maximizing detectable targets for offensive/volatile odorants with diverse functional groups by thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Yong-Hyun Kim; Ki-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of the volatile organic compound recovery rates of commercial active samplers for evaluation of indoor air quality in work environments.

Authors:  Yuichi Miyake; Masahiro Tokumura; Qi Wang; Zhiwei Wang; Takashi Amagai
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 3.763

7.  Different methods for volatile sampling in mammals.

Authors:  Marlen Kücklich; Manfred Möller; Andrea Marcillo; Almuth Einspanier; Brigitte M Weiß; Claudia Birkemeyer; Anja Widdig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of Adsorption/Desorption of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) on Electrospun Nanofibers with Tenax TA for Potential Application in Sampling.

Authors:  Lanling Chu; Siwei Deng; Renshan Zhao; Jianjun Deng; Xuejun Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  VOC contamination in hospital, from stationary sampling of a large panel of compounds, in view of healthcare workers and patients exposure assessment.

Authors:  Vincent Bessonneau; Luc Mosqueron; Adèle Berrubé; Gaël Mukensturm; Sylvie Buffet-Bataillon; Jean-Pierre Gangneux; Olivier Thomas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Performance comparison of MOF and other sorbent materials in removing key odorants emitted from pigpen slurry.

Authors:  Ezaz Ahmed; Akash Deep; Eilhann E Kwon; Richard J C Brown; Ki-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.