Literature DB >> 20298730

Restrained eaters show enhanced automatic approach tendencies towards food.

Esther M Veenstra1, Peter J de Jong.   

Abstract

Although restrained eaters intend to limit their caloric intake, they nevertheless frequently fail and indulge in exactly the foods they want to avoid. Because automatic food-relevant approach tendencies and affective associations may both (independently) contribute to the dysregulation of food intake, the present study was designed to investigate the importance of both processes in relation to high-fat and low-fat food in restrained and unrestrained eaters. Both restrained and unrestrained eaters demonstrated stronger automatic liking associations with high-fat food than with low-fat food items, whereas a similar pattern was absent in their self-reports of liking food. Interestingly, specifically restrained eaters also displayed relatively strong automatic approach tendencies. These results appear to be consistent with the incentive-sensitization theory (Robinson & Berridge, 2001), as overeating seems not so much to be characterized by enhanced liking of food but by stronger automatic approach tendencies towards food. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20298730     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  11 in total

Review 1.  Restrained Eating and Food Cues: Recent Findings and Conclusions.

Authors:  Janet Polivy; C Peter Herman
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2017-03

2.  Modifying food items valuation and weight with gamified executive control training.

Authors:  Hugo Najberg; Maurizio Rigamonti; Michael Mouthon; Lucas Spierer
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Stopping to food can reduce intake. Effects of stimulus-specificity and individual differences in dietary restraint.

Authors:  Natalia S Lawrence; Frederick Verbruggen; Sinead Morrison; Rachel C Adams; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 4.  Emotional Eating Is Not What You Think It Is and Emotional Eating Scales Do Not Measure What You Think They Measure.

Authors:  Peggy Bongers; Anita Jansen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-08

5.  Automatic Approach Tendencies toward High and Low Caloric Food in Restrained Eaters: Influence of Task-Relevance and Mood.

Authors:  Renate A M Neimeijer; Anne Roefs; Brian D Ostafin; Peter J de Jong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-11

6.  Food-related salience processing in healthy subjects during word recognition: Fronto-parietal network activation as revealed by independent component analysis.

Authors:  Annette Safi; Christoph Nikendei; Valentin Terhoeven; Matthias Weisbrod; Anuradha Sharma
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 7.  Food Addiction: Implications for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Overeating.

Authors:  Rachel C Adams; Jemma Sedgmond; Leah Maizey; Christopher D Chambers; Natalia S Lawrence
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Implicit bias to food and body cues in eating disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Georgios Paslakis; Anne Deborah Scholz-Hehn; Laura Marie Sommer; Simone Kühn
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 4.652

9.  Motivational Mechanisms and Outcome Expectancies Underlying the Approach Bias toward Addictive Substances.

Authors:  P Watson; S de Wit; Bernhard Hommel; R W Wiers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-22

10.  The ABBA study - approach bias modification in bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Timo Brockmeyer; Ulrike Schmidt; Hans-Christoph Friederich
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.