Literature DB >> 20298472

Six quantitative trait loci influence task thresholds for hygienic behaviour in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Peter R Oxley1, Marla Spivak, Benjamin P Oldroyd.   

Abstract

Honeybee hygienic behaviour provides colonies with protection from many pathogens and is an important model system of the genetics of a complex behaviour. It is a textbook example of complex behaviour under simple genetic control: hygienic behaviour consists of two components--uncapping a diseased brood cell, followed by removal of the contents--each of which are thought to be modulated independently by a few loci of medium to large effect. A worker's genetic propensity to engage in hygienic tasks affects the intensity of the stimulus required before she initiates the behaviour. Genetic diversity within colonies leads to task specialization among workers, with a minority of workers performing the majority of nest-cleaning tasks. We identify three quantitative trait loci that influence the likelihood that workers will engage in hygienic behaviour and account for up to 30% of the phenotypic variability in hygienic behaviour in our population. Furthermore, we identify two loci that influence the likelihood that a worker will perform uncapping behaviour only, and one locus that influences removal behaviour. We report the first candidate genes associated with engaging in hygienic behaviour, including four genes involved in olfaction, learning and social behaviour, and one gene involved in circadian locomotion. These candidates will allow molecular characterization of this distinctive behavioural mode of disease resistance, as well as providing the opportunity for marker-assisted selection for this commercially significant trait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20298472     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04569.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  28 in total

1.  Rapid anti-pathogen response in ant societies relies on high genetic diversity.

Authors:  Line V Ugelvig; Daniel J C Kronauer; Alexandra Schrempf; Jürgen Heinze; Sylvia Cremer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Endemic social diversity within natural kin groups of a cooperative bacterium.

Authors:  Susanne A Kraemer; Gregory J Velicer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Architecture of the Pollen Hoarding Syndrome in Honey Bees: Implications for Understanding Social Evolution, Behavioral Syndromes, and Selective Breeding.

Authors:  Olav Rueppell
Journal:  Apidologie       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.318

4.  Genome-Wide Association Study of a Varroa-Specific Defense Behavior in Honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Andreas Spötter; Pooja Gupta; Manfred Mayer; Norbert Reinsch; Kaspar Bienefeld
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  Both hygienic and non-hygienic honeybee, Apis mellifera, colonies remove dead and diseased larvae from open brood cells.

Authors:  Hasan Al Toufailia; Sophie E F Evison; William O H Hughes; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Correlation of proteome-wide changes with social immunity behaviors provides insight into resistance to the parasitic mite, Varroa destructor, in the honey bee (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Robert Parker; M Marta Guarna; Andony P Melathopoulos; Kyung-Mee Moon; Rick White; Elizabeth Huxter; Stephen F Pernal; Leonard J Foster
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Comparing alternative methods for holding virgin honey bee queens for one week in mailing cages before mating.

Authors:  Gianluigi Bigio; Christoph Grüter; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  High-resolution linkage analyses to identify genes that influence Varroa sensitive hygiene behavior in honey bees.

Authors:  Jennifer M Tsuruda; Jeffrey W Harris; Lanie Bourgeois; Robert G Danka; Greg J Hunt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Multiple mating but not recombination causes quantitative increase in offspring genetic diversity for varying genetic architectures.

Authors:  Olav Rueppell; Stephen Meier; Roland Deutsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Genetic architecture of sexual selection: QTL mapping of male song and female receiver traits in an acoustic moth.

Authors:  Denis Limousin; Réjane Streiff; Brigitte Courtois; Virginie Dupuy; Sylvain Alem; Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.