Literature DB >> 20298346

Norwegian population surveys on respiratory health in adults: objectives, design, methods, quality controls and response rates.

A Gulsvik1, S Humerfelt, P S Bakke, E R Omenaas, S Lehmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Quantifying the prevalence of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and restrictive pulmonary diseases in Norway is needed to document the burden of chronic respiratory inflammatory diseases on disability, health care costs and impaired quality of life. To introduce effective interventions for prevention, cure and care, there is a prerequisite to know the environmental causes. Furthermore, using relevant and precise phenotypes from community-based studies are important for detecting molecular-genetic causes for diseases.
METHODS: The Norwegian Population Survey Initiative on Respiratory Health in Adults has, for four decades, applied international standardised methods for the recording of respiratory symptoms, health status, exposure to risk factors, socio-economic factors and the use of health services. Measurements of spirometry, metacholine bronchial responsiveness, transfer factor for carbon monoxide, atopy as well as chest X-ray examinations have been used advocating the internationally accepted methods. All surveys had similar quality controls, supervision and training of the field-worker team.
RESULTS: From 1965 to 1999, random population samples, altogether including 178 690 individuals, have been invited by random sampling to seven surveys on respiratory health in the counties of Oslo (39 998 people) and Hordaland (138 692 people). The surveys were initiated in 1964, 1972, 1985, 1988, 1991 and two in 1998. The age span of those invited persons varied from 15 to 74 years at baseline. It included 43 330 women and 135 537 men. Altogether 130 075 (73%) persons participated by returning an answered questionnaire. Spirometry results are available from 41 335 persons at baseline. A biobank for DNA and blood markers has been established. Data from longitudinally clinical-epidemiological studies were available by 2007, for three surveys after 20 years, 10 years and 6-7 years, and also for parts of three other surveys, while one survey has been examined for cause-specific mortality after 30 years. The response rates of the baseline studies varied from 90% to 68% of those invited and, in general, it has declined over 35 years. The response rate of the longitudinal studies with follow-ups also declined with time after the baseline study.
CONCLUSIONS: Great challenges for future population-based studies are (i) to keep the participation rates high in community studies; (ii) to standardise the basic clinical-epidemiological methods over decades of follow-up and to systematically transfer these methods into new populations with different languages and cultures and (iii) to focus on important research questions on respiratory health for the community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 20298346     DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-699X.2008.00080.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Respir J        ISSN: 1752-6981            Impact factor:   2.570


  6 in total

1.  Increased mortality in the slim elderly: a 42 years follow-up study in a general population.

Authors:  Anne K Gulsvik; Dag S Thelle; Morten Mowé; Torgeir B Wyller
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Respiratory symptoms and cardiovascular causes of deaths: A population-based study with 45 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Knut Stavem; Henrik Schirmer; Amund Gulsvik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Quantitative CT: Associations between Emphysema, Airway Wall Thickness and Body Composition in COPD.

Authors:  Erica P A Rutten; Thomas B Grydeland; Sreekumar G Pillai; Scott Wagers; Asger Dirksen; Harvey O Coxson; Amund Gulsvik; Emiel F M Wouters; Per S Bakke
Journal:  Pulm Med       Date:  2011-01-16

4.  Diagnostic validity of fatal cerebral strokes and coronary deaths in mortality statistics: an autopsy study.

Authors:  Anne K Gulsvik; Amund Gulsvik; Einar Svendsen; Bjørn O Mæhle; Dag S Thelle; Torgeir B Wyller
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Motivation and response rates in bronchoscopy studies.

Authors:  Einar M H Martinsen; Tomas M L Eagan; Elise O Leiten; Eli Nordeide; Per S Bakke; Sverre Lehmann; Rune Nielsen
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2019-05-02

6.  Respiratory symptoms and respiratory deaths: A multi-cohort study with 45 years observation time.

Authors:  Knut Stavem; Ane Johannessen; Rune Nielsen; Amund Gulsvik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.