Literature DB >> 2029044

Socioeconomic status and survival from soft-tissue sarcomas: a population-based study in northern Italy.

G Ciccone1, C Magnani, L Delsedime, P Vineis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Differential prognosis among cancer patients according to socioeconomic status (SES) has been reported. We analyzed survival from soft tissue sarcomas (STS) according to different SES indicators.
METHODS: We followed up all the adult patients with a new diagnosis of STS occurring between 1.1.1981 and 31.12.1983 in an area of Northern Italy (N = 86).
RESULTS: The overall three-year survival rate was 57 percent. After adjustment for confounders, both low education and blue collar jobs were negatively associated with survival.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that patients of low SES have a poorer prognosis for STS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2029044      PMCID: PMC1405155          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.81.6.747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  Prognostication in soft tissue sarcoma. A model with four risk factors.

Authors:  B Rööser; R Attewell; N O Berg; A Rydholm
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1966-03

3.  Survival of cancer patients by economic status in a free care setting.

Authors:  W Keirn; G Metter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Economic status and survival of cancer patients.

Authors:  J W Berg; R Ross; H B Latourette
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Soft-tissue sarcomas of adults; study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathological grading system.

Authors:  M Trojani; G Contesso; J M Coindre; J Rouesse; N B Bui; A de Mascarel; J F Goussot; M David; F Bonichon; C Lagarde
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1984-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Cancer patient survival among ethnic groups in the United States.

Authors:  J L Young; L G Ries; E S Pollack
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Multivariate analysis for clinical prognostic factors in 163 patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  T Ueda; K Aozasa; M Tsujimoto; H Hamada; H Hayashi; K Ono; K Matsumoto
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Cancer survival and social class in Sweden.

Authors:  D Vågerö; G Persson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Phenoxy herbicides and soft-tissue sarcomas in female rice weeders. A population-based case-referent study.

Authors:  P Vineis; B Terracini; G Ciccone; A Cignetti; E Colombo; A Donna; L Maffi; R Pisa; P Ricci; E Zanini
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.024

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  An international comparison of cancer survival: Toronto, Ontario, and Detroit, Michigan, metropolitan areas.

Authors:  K M Gorey; E J Holowaty; G Fehringer; E Laukkanen; A Moskowitz; D J Webster; N L Richter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.