Literature DB >> 2028118

A statistical method for assessing a threshold in epidemiological studies.

K Ulm1.   

Abstract

I describe a method for estimating and testing a threshold value in epidemiological studies. A threshold effect indicates an association between a risk factor and a defined outcome above the threshold value but none below it. An important field of application is occupational medicine where, for a lot of chemical compounds and other agents which are non-carcinogenic health hazards, so-called threshold limit values or TLVs are specified. The method is presented within the framework of the logistic regression model, which is widely used in the analysis of the relationship between some explanatory variables and a dependent dichotomous outcome. In most available programs for this and also for other models the concept of a threshold is disregarded. The method for assessing a threshold consists of an estimation procedure using the maximum-likelihood technique and a test procedure based on the likelihood-ratio statistic R, following under the null hypothesis (no threshold) a quasi one-sided chi 2 distribution with one degree of freedom. This use of this distribution is supported by a simulation study. The method is applied to data from an epidemiological study of the relationship between occupational dust exposure and chronic bronchitic reactions. The results are confirmed by bootstrap resampling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2028118     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780100306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  28 in total

1.  Cadmium and lung cancer mortality accounting for simultaneous arsenic exposure.

Authors:  Robert M Park; Leslie T Stayner; Martin R Petersen; Melissa Finley-Couch; Richard Hornung; Carol Rice
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Relationship between glycated haemoglobin and microvascular complications: is there a natural cut-off point for the diagnosis of diabetes?

Authors:  C Sabanayagam; G Liew; E S Tai; A Shankar; S C Lim; T Subramaniam; T Y Wong
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 3.  Methods for assessing the extent of exposure and effects of air pollution.

Authors:  M Krzyzanowski
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Model-robust inference for continuous threshold regression models.

Authors:  Youyi Fong; Chongzhi Di; Ying Huang; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Detecting Departure From Additivity Along a Fixed-Ratio Mixture Ray With a Piecewise Model for Dose and Interaction Thresholds.

Authors:  Sharon D Yeatts; Chris Gennings; Elizabeth D Wagner; Jane Ellen Simmons; Michael J Plewa
Journal:  J Agric Biol Environ Stat       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 1.524

6.  Methods for generalized change-point models: with applications to human immunodeficiency virus surveillance and diabetes data.

Authors:  Jean de Dieu Tapsoba; Ching-Yun Wang; Sahar Zangeneh; Ying Qing Chen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Rate of elective cholecystectomy and the incidence of severe gallstone disease.

Authors:  David R Urbach; Thérèse A Stukel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Optimal experimental design strategies for detecting hormesis.

Authors:  Holger Dette; Andrey Pepelyshev; Weng Kee Wong
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  Effect of dust exposure and nitrogen oxides on lung function parameters of German coalminers: a longitudinal study applying GEE regression 1974-1998.

Authors:  P Morfeld; B Noll; S F Büchte; R Derwall; V Schenk; H J Bicker; H Lenaerts; N Schrader; D Dahmann
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Relation between fasting glucose and retinopathy for diagnosis of diabetes: three population-based cross-sectional studies.

Authors:  Tien Y Wong; Gerald Liew; Robyn J Tapp; Maria Inês Schmidt; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell; Ronald Klein; Barbara E K Klein; Paul Zimmet; Jonathan Shaw
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.