Literature DB >> 2027445

Evaluation of the carotid artery bifurcation: comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction arch aortography.

D K Kido1, J B Barsotti, L Z Rice, B M Rothenberg, R J Panzer, S P Souza, C L Dumoulin.   

Abstract

Thirty-four carotid artery bifurcations were examined using both magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction arch aortography to determine their accuracy when compared to selective carotid angiography. The sensitivity of MRA was 73% and its specificity was 91% when compared with selective carotid angiography. The sensitivity of arch aortography was 27% and its specificity was 100%.

Mesh：

Year:  1991        PMID： 2027445     DOI： 10.1007/bf00593333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN： 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  18 in total

1.  Doppler color flow imaging.

Authors:  C R Merritt
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.910

2.  Vascular intracranial lesions: applications of gradient-echo MR imaging.

Authors:  S W Atlas; A S Mark; E K Fram; R I Grossman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Color-flow Doppler imaging of carotid artery abnormalities.

Authors:  W D Middleton; W D Foley; T L Lawson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Duplex ultrasonography, intravenous digital subtraction angiography, intraarterial digital subtraction angiography and conventional angiography in assessing carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  H J Mendel; F Olbert; A Schlegl; M Nebosis
Journal:  Ann Radiol (Paris)       Date:  1987

5.  Digital subtraction cerebral angiography by intraarterial injection: comparison with conventional angiography.

Authors:  M Brant-Zawadzki; R Gould; D Norman; T H Newton; B Lane
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Digital intraarterial subtraction technique of the extracerebral vascular system.

Authors:  A L Baert; G E Wilms; F de Somer; J Smits
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Work in progress. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography: evaluation in 150 patients.

Authors:  P C Davis; J C Hoffman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  When and how to study the carotid arteries.

Authors:  J R Feussner; D B Matchar
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Carotid digital subtraction angiography: the comparative roles of intra-arterial and intravenous imaging.

Authors:  L M Reilly; W K Ehrenfeld; R J Stoney
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Aortic arch digital arteriography: an alternative technique to digital venous angiography and routine arteriography in the evaluation of cerebrovascular insufficiency.

Authors:  R D Zimmerman; M J Goldman; M Auster; C Chen; N E Leeds
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.825
View more
  8 in total

1.  Total occlusion versus hairline residual lumen of the internal carotid arteries: accuracy of single section helical CT angiography.

Authors:  Michael H Lev; Javier M Romero; Daniel N F Goodman; Ranjit Bagga; H Young Kwon Kim; Neil A Clerk; Robert H Ackerman; R Gilberto Gonzalez
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: comparison of unenhanced and contrast enhanced techniques.

Authors:  Harald Kramer; Val M Runge; John N Morelli; Kenneth D Williams; L Gill Naul; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Incidental intracranial vascular pathology in patients investigated for carotid stenosis.

Authors:  P D Griffiths; S Worthy; A Gholkar
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  G R Young; P R Humphrey; M D Shaw; T E Nixon; E T Smith
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Familial occurrence of moyamoya disease. Magnetic resonance angiography as a screening test for high-risk subjects.

Authors:  K Houkin; N Tanaka; A Takahashi; H Kamiyama; H Abe; N Kajii
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Magnetic resonance angiography of supratentorial tumours: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  G Wilms; H Bosmans; G Marchal; P Demaerel; J Goffin; C Plets; A L Baert
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Striatocapsular infarction: MRI and MR angiography.

Authors:  P Croisille; F Turjman; B Croisile; P Tournut; J C Laharotte; G Aimard; M Trillet; J Duquesnel; J C Froment
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of ruptured cerebral aneurysm.

Authors:  K Houkin; T Aoki; A Takahashi; H Abe; M Koiwa; T Kashiwaba
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.