Literature DB >> 2025039

Evaluation of computer generated neonatal discharge summaries.

T Lissauer1, C M Paterson, A Simons, R W Beard.   

Abstract

Computer generated and dictated discharge summaries were compared for all 133 babies admitted for intensive and special care during a six month period. Whereas 130/133 (98%) had a computer generated summary, only 94/133 (71%) had a dictated summary. In addition, computerised summaries were completed at discharge, but there was a delay up to 26 weeks for dictated summaries. Dictated summaries had more items of basic data missing but were more readable. A main diagnosis was missing in only 5/95 (5%) of dictated and 1/130 (1%) computerised summaries. Of the computer generated summaries, 114/133 (86%) were suitable to give to parents. Satisfactory discharge summaries for babies requiring intensive or special care can be generated with an on line computer system.

Mesh：

Year:  1991        PMID： 2025039      PMCID： PMC1590307          DOI： 10.1136/adc.66.4_spec_no.433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN： 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  2 in total

1.  Assessment of an on-line computerized perinatal data collection and information system.

Authors:  M Maresh; A M Dawson; R W Beard
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1986-12

2.  Selection of an obstetric data base for a microcomputer and its use for on-line production of birth notification forms, discharge summaries and perinatal audit.

Authors:  M Maresh; R W Beard; D Combe; A M Dawson; M D Gillmer; G Smith; P J Steer
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-03
  2 in total
  8 in total

1.  Computerised neonatal information systems.

Authors:  S A Spencer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Design and Hospitalwide Implementation of a Standardized Discharge Summary in an Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Shannon M Dean; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Joel Buchanan; Brad Ehlenfeldt; Amy J H Kind
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2016-12-16

3.  Dictated versus database-generated discharge summaries: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  C van Walraven; A Laupacis; R Seth; G Wells
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-02-09       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Quality of inguinal hernia operative reports: room for improvement.

Authors:  Grace W Ma; Amandeep Pooni; Shawn S Forbes; Cagla Eskicioglu; Emily Pearsall; Fred D Brenneman; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Electronic versus dictated hospital discharge summaries: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David M Maslove; Richard E Leiter; Joshua Griesman; Corinne Arnott; Ophyr Mourad; Chi-Ming Chow; Chaim M Bell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Omission of dysphagia therapies in hospital discharge communications.

Authors:  Amy Kind; Paul Anderson; Jacqueline Hind; JoAnne Robbins; Maureen Smith
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2010-01-23       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 7.  Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations.

Authors:  P Vermeir; D Vandijck; S Degroote; R Peleman; R Verhaeghe; E Mortier; G Hallaert; S Van Daele; W Buylaert; D Vogelaers
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Co-development of a transitions in care bundle for patient transitions from the intensive care unit: a mixed-methods analysis of a stakeholder consensus meeting.

Authors:  Brianna K Rosgen; Kara M Plotnikoff; Karla D Krewulak; Anmol Shahid; Laura Hernandez; Bonnie G Sept; Jeanna Morrissey; Kristin Robertson; Nancy Fraser; Daniel J Niven; Sharon E Straus; Jeanna Parsons Leigh; Henry T Stelfox; Kirsten M Fiest
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 2.655
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.