Literature DB >> 2024740

Double-blind comparison of epidural diamorphine and intramuscular morphine after elective caesarean section, with computerised analysis of continuous pulse oximetry.

J D Stevens1, P Braithwaite, C F Corke, T H Madej, R G Wheatley.   

Abstract

A randomised, double-blind comparison of the efficacy, duration of action and side effects of two analgesic regimens following elective epidural Caesarean section is described. Patients received epidural diamorphine 3 mg or intramuscular morphine 10 mg in the immediate postoperative period. Time to next analgesia was longer after epidural diamorphine (11.0 hours) compared to intramuscular morphine (6.5 hours) (p less than 0.05). In addition, a greater number of patients in the diamorphine group had a pain score less than 2.5 cm at 5 hours (p less than 0.05). However, more patients in the diamorphine group required catheterisation and suffered emetic sequelae, whereas more patients in the morphine group were sedated at 8 hours. Ten patients in each group had continuous pulse oximetry performed overnight after administration of the trial medications. Neither group demonstrated evidence of hypoxia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2024740     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb11491.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  1 in total

1.  Assessing introduction of spinal anaesthesia for obstetric procedures.

Authors:  T H Madej; I J Jackson; R G Wheatley; J Wilson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.