Comparison of differences in the hemodynamic response to passive postural stress in healthy subjects greater than 70 years and less than 30 years of age.

To test the hypothesis that age-related increases in arterial pressure alter the cardiovascular response to physiologic stress, 9 healthy elderly volunteers (74 +/- 2 years) and 7 young subjects (27 +/- 3 years) were subjected to a standard 60 degrees upright tilt. Cardiac volumes were measured with patients in the supine position and 5 minutes after they assumed an upright posture using radionuclide ventriculography, while heart rate, blood pressure and forearm cutaneous flow were recorded continuously and simultaneously. Only the expected age-related increase in mean arterial pressure (young subjects, 79 +/- 1 mm Hg; elderly subjects, 99 +/- 3 mm Hg; p less than 0.001) distinguished the 2 groups at baseline. However, during upright tilt, elderly subjects had significant decreases in stroke volume (supine [108 +/- 9 ml] vs upright [78 +/- 9 ml]; p less than 0.01) and cardiac index (supine [3.4 +/- 0.2 liters/min/m2] vs upright [2.8 +/- 0.2 liters/min/m2]; p less than 0.05) because of an inability to reduce end-systolic volume (supine, 44 +/- 6 ml; upright, 51 +/- 7 ml); however, mean arterial pressure was maintained through an increase in peripheral resistance. In contrast, the young relied solely on cardiac adaptations to postural stress by decreasing end-systolic volume (supine, 62 +/- 5 ml; upright, 39 +/- 5 ml; p less than 0.01) and increasing heart rate (57 +/- 2 min-1 to 71 +/- 3 min-1, p less than 0.01), whereby cardiac output and mean arterial pressure were maintained during tilt.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)