Literature DB >> 20237760

Bolus remifentanil for chest drain removal in ICU: a randomized double-blind comparison of three modes of analgesia in post-cardiac surgical patients.

Eoin Casey1, Aoife Lane, Dinesh Kuriakose, Shane McGeary, Niamh Hayes, Dermot Phelan, Donal Buggy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared 1 versus 0.5 microg/kg bolus remifentanil versus placebo in alleviating pain due to chest drain removal. Effects on sedation, respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure were also evaluated.
METHODS: Sixty patients following cardiac surgery were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Patients were randomized to 1 or 0.5 microg/kg remifentanil or placebo. All received standardized analgesia. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and cardio-respiratory data were recorded pre-procedure, at drain removal and at 2 min intervals post procedure.
RESULTS: Patients receiving remifentanil had statistically significantly less pain than placebo at drain removal [median (25-75%) VAS: 0.5 microg/kg remifentanil 1 (0-2) versus placebo 5 (3-6), P = 0.001; 1.0 microg/kg remifentanil 0 (0-2) versus placebo 5 (3-6), P = 0.0001]. VAS scores between remifentanil groups were equivalent. Remifentanil 1 microg/kg versus placebo at drain removal revealed significant reductions in HR [mean +/- standard deviation (SD): 76 +/- 15 versus 92 +/- 10, P = 0.01], blood pressure [mean +/- SD: 103 +/- 22 versus 131 +/- 14, P = 0.01] and RR [median (25-75%): 10 (8-12) versus 16 (14-18), P = 0.001]. Remifentanil 0.5 microg/kg versus placebo at drain removal revealed significant reductions in blood pressure [mean +/- SD: 116 +/- 19 versus 131 +/- 14, P = 0.02] and RR [median (25-75%): 12 (10-13) versus 18 (16-18), P = 0.001]. SpO(2) at drain removal was significantly reduced when comparing 1 microg/kg remifentanil versus placebo [median (25-75%): 94 (88-97) versus 97 (96-98), P = 0.049] but not 0.5 microg/kg remifentanil versus placebo. Two patients became apnoeic following 1 microg/kg remifentanil, necessitating respiratory support. Sedation scores in all groups were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: Bolus remifentanil at the tested doses delivers excellent analgesia, but 1 microg/kg remifentanil results in respiratory depression. Remifentanil bolus at 0.5 microg/kg is safe and effective for chest drain removal after heart surgery in ICU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20237760     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-1836-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  23 in total

Review 1.  A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil.

Authors:  P S Glass; T J Gan; S Howell
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Sensations experienced during removal of tubes in acute postoperative patients.

Authors:  L Mimnaugh; M Winegar; Y Mabrey; J E Davis
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.257

3.  Can any intervention effectively reduce the pain associated with chest drain removal?

Authors:  James Barnard; Jacqueline Thompson; Joel Dunning
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-06

4.  Intubation and other experiences in cardiac surgery: the consumer's views.

Authors:  B Paiement; M Boulanger; C W Jones; M Roy
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1979-05

5.  Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients.

Authors:  R R Riker; J T Picard; G L Fraser
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Midazolam and remifentanil by bolus injection for intensely stimulating procedures of brief duration: experience with awake laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Ken B Johnson; Jeffrey D Swenson; Talmage D Egan; Robert Jarrett; Mathew Johnson
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Rheumatoid arthritis: determination of pain characteristics and comparison of RAI and VAS in its measurement.

Authors:  Fannie Gaston-Johansson; Marianne Gustafsson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Intravenous remifentanil and propofol for gastroscopy.

Authors:  Zhi Y Xu; Xiao Wang; Yong Y Si; Jun C Wu; Yun X Zuo; Fu S Xue; Jin Liu
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 9.452

9.  Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED.

Authors:  E John Gallagher; Polly E Bijur; Clarke Latimer; Wendy Silver
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.469

10.  Managing pain during mediastinal chest tube removal.

Authors:  M M Carson; D M Barton; C C Morrison; C G Tribble
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.210

View more
  8 in total

1.  Fentanyl as pre-emptive treatment of pain associated with turning mechanically ventilated patients: a randomized controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Gemma Robleda; Ferran Roche-Campo; Maria-Àngels Sendra; Marta Navarro; Ana Castillo; Ainhoa Rodríguez-Arias; Elena Juanes-Borrego; Ignasi Gich; Gerard Urrutia; José M Nicolás-Arfelis; Kathleen Puntillo; Jordi Mancebo; Josep E Baños
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Adjunctive remifentanil infusion in deeply sedated and paralyzed ICU patients during fiberoptic bronchoscopy procedure: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Hervé Quintard; Isabelle Pavlakovic; Jean Mantz; Carole Ichai
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 6.925

3.  Short-term use of remifentanil during endotracheal extubation for prophylactic analgesia in neurosurgical patients after craniotomy (SURE after Craniotomy Study): a study protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Yuan-Xing Wu; Han Chen; Jian-Xin Zhou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Analgesic efficacy of lidocaine and multimodal analgesia for chest tube removal: A randomized trial study.

Authors:  Valdecy Ferreira de Oliveira Pinheiro; José Madson Vidal da Costa; Marcelo Matos Cascudo; Ênio de Oliveira Pinheiro; Maria Angela Ferreira Fernandes; Ivonete Batista de Araujo
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

5.  Effect of different cold application materials on pain during chest tube removal: three-arm randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Dilara Soydan; Gülay Altun Uğraş
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 6.  Pain in Intensive Care: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Pota; Francesco Coppolino; Alfonso Barbarisi; Maria Beatrice Passavanti; Caterina Aurilio; Pasquale Sansone; Maria Caterina Pace
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2022-02-27

7.  Effect of cold application in combination with Indomethacin suppository on chest tube removal pain in patients undergoing open heart surgery.

Authors:  Mitra B Payami; Nahid Daryei; Nouraddin Mousavinasab; Eskandar Nourizade
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2014-01

Review 8.  Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015) - short version.

Authors:  Ralf Baron; Andreas Binder; Rolf Biniek; Stephan Braune; Hartmut Buerkle; Peter Dall; Sueha Demirakca; Rahel Eckardt; Verena Eggers; Ingolf Eichler; Ingo Fietze; Stephan Freys; Andreas Fründ; Lars Garten; Bernhard Gohrbandt; Irene Harth; Wolfgang Hartl; Hans-Jürgen Heppner; Johannes Horter; Ralf Huth; Uwe Janssens; Christine Jungk; Kristin Maria Kaeuper; Paul Kessler; Stefan Kleinschmidt; Matthias Kochanek; Matthias Kumpf; Andreas Meiser; Anika Mueller; Maritta Orth; Christian Putensen; Bernd Roth; Michael Schaefer; Rainhild Schaefers; Peter Schellongowski; Monika Schindler; Reinhard Schmitt; Jens Scholz; Stefan Schroeder; Gerhard Schwarzmann; Claudia Spies; Robert Stingele; Peter Tonner; Uwe Trieschmann; Michael Tryba; Frank Wappler; Christian Waydhas; Bjoern Weiss; Guido Weisshaar
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.