Literature DB >> 20237260

Differences in photoreceptor processing speed for chromatic and achromatic vision in the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris.

Peter Skorupski1, Lars Chittka.   

Abstract

Fast detection of visual change can be mediated by visual processes that ignore chromatic aspects of the visual signal, relying on inputs from a single photoreceptor class (or pooled input from similar classes). There is an established link between photoreceptor processing speed (in achromatic vision) and visual ecology. Highly maneuverable flies, for example, have the fastest know photoreceptors, relying on metabolically expensive membrane conductances to boost performance. Less active species forgo this investment and their photoreceptors are correspondingly slower. However, within a species, additional classes of photoreceptors are required to extract chromatic information, and the question therefore arises as to whether there might be within-species differences in processing speed between photoreceptors involved in chromatic processing compared with those feeding into fast achromatic visual systems. We used intracellular recording to compare light-adapted impulse responses in three spectral classes of photoreceptor in the bumblebee. Green-sensitive photoreceptors, which are known to provide achromatic contrast for motion detection, generated the fastest impulse responses (half-width, Deltat = 7.9 +/- 1.1 ms). Blue- and UV-sensitive photoreceptors (which are involved in color vision) were significantly slower (9.8 +/- 1.2 and 12.3 +/- 1.8 ms, respectively). The faster responses of green photoreceptors are in keeping with their role in fast achromatic vision. However, blue and UV photoreceptors are still relatively fast in comparison with many other insect species, as well as vertebrate cones, suggesting a significant investment in photoreceptor processing for color vision in bees. We discuss this finding in relation to bees' requirement for accurate learning of flower color, especially in conditions of variable luminance contrast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20237260      PMCID: PMC6632265          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5700-09.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  29 in total

1.  Visual outdoor response of multiple wild bee species: highly selective stimulation of a single photoreceptor type by sunlight-induced fluorescence.

Authors:  Sujaya Rao; Oksana Ostroverkhova
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Photic niche invasions: phylogenetic history of the dim-light foraging augochlorine bees (Halictidae).

Authors:  Simon M Tierney; Oris Sanjur; Grethel G Grajales; Leandro M Santos; Eldredge Bermingham; William T Wcislo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Information processing in miniature brains.

Authors:  L Chittka; P Skorupski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Insect vision models under scrutiny: what bumblebees (Bombus terrestris terrestris L.) can still tell us.

Authors:  Francismeire Jane Telles; Miguel A Rodríguez-Gironés
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-01-23

5.  Membrane filtering properties of the bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) photoreceptors across three spectral classes.

Authors:  Antti Vähäkainu; Mikko Vähäsöyrinki; Matti Weckström
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The path to colour discrimination is S-shaped: behaviour determines the interpretation of colour models.

Authors:  Jair E Garcia; Johannes Spaethe; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) and honeybees (Apis mellifera) prefer similar colours of higher spectral purity over trained colours.

Authors:  Katja Rohde; Sarah Papiorek; Klaus Lunau
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Rapid decision-making with side-specific perceptual discrimination in ants.

Authors:  Nathalie Stroeymeyt; Fernando J Guerrieri; Jelle S van Zweden; Patrizia d'Ettorre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Improving decision speed, accuracy and group cohesion through early information gathering in house-hunting ants.

Authors:  Nathalie Stroeymeyt; Martin Giurfa; Nigel R Franks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Difference in dynamic properties of photoreceptors in a butterfly, Papilio xuthus: possible segregation of motion and color processing.

Authors:  Masashi Kawasaki; Michiyo Kinoshita; Matti Weckström; Kentaro Arikawa
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.