BACKGROUND: Estimates suggest that over half of general practices in England currently employ a health care assistant (HCA) but there is little evidence of their impact, effectiveness and acceptability to patients and primary care team members. OBJECTIVES: To explore the role of HCAs in general practice and the benefits and challenges associated with their employment. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were performed with 6 GPs and 13 practice nurses as part of a larger qualitative study that also included HCAs. Interviewees were from 16 general practices from two Primary Care Trusts in the West Midlands. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic and framework analysis. RESULTS: HCAs were seen as a valuable addition to the primary care team. They were reported to accelerate, rather than extend services, allow more appropriate use of nurses' skills and enable cost containment. Their training and supervision were felt as time intensive, demanding of time and commitment. Patient safety was raised as a concern, although no specific experience of it being compromised was reported. Nurses recognized the usefulness of HCAs, helped to make the role work, but were often anxious about the impact on their own roles and professional identity. Patients were perceived as being generally neutral or positive. CONCLUSION: Cost-effectiveness, patient safety, quality of care, potentially contested role boundaries and patient attitudes are among the issues that policy-makers, commissioners and those responsible for workforce development and training need to consider in relation to HCAs in general practice. There is also a need for more in-depth evaluation of this role.
BACKGROUND: Estimates suggest that over half of general practices in England currently employ a health care assistant (HCA) but there is little evidence of their impact, effectiveness and acceptability to patients and primary care team members. OBJECTIVES: To explore the role of HCAs in general practice and the benefits and challenges associated with their employment. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were performed with 6 GPs and 13 practice nurses as part of a larger qualitative study that also included HCAs. Interviewees were from 16 general practices from two Primary Care Trusts in the West Midlands. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic and framework analysis. RESULTS: HCAs were seen as a valuable addition to the primary care team. They were reported to accelerate, rather than extend services, allow more appropriate use of nurses' skills and enable cost containment. Their training and supervision were felt as time intensive, demanding of time and commitment. Patient safety was raised as a concern, although no specific experience of it being compromised was reported. Nurses recognized the usefulness of HCAs, helped to make the role work, but were often anxious about the impact on their own roles and professional identity. Patients were perceived as being generally neutral or positive. CONCLUSION: Cost-effectiveness, patient safety, quality of care, potentially contested role boundaries and patient attitudes are among the issues that policy-makers, commissioners and those responsible for workforce development and training need to consider in relation to HCAs in general practice. There is also a need for more in-depth evaluation of this role.
Authors: Rosemary Hiscock; Susan Murray; Leonie S Brose; Andy McEwen; Jo Leonardi Bee; Fiona Dobbie; Linda Bauld Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2013-07-21 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Patrick Kierkegaard; Timothy Hicks; A Joy Allen; Yaling Yang; Gail Hayward; Margaret Glogowska; Brian D Nicholson; Peter Buckle Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2021-12-18
Authors: Marthe B L Mansour; Matty R Crone; Henk C van Weert; Niels H Chavannes; Kristel M van Asselt Journal: Eur J Gen Pract Date: 2022-12 Impact factor: 1.904
Authors: Kathryn Faulkner; Stephen Sutton; James Jamison; Melanie Sloan; Sue Boase; Felix Naughton Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 4.244