Literature DB >> 20236754

Simulated wetland conservation-restoration effects on water quantity and quality at watershed scale.

Xixi Wang1, Shiyou Shang, Zhongyi Qu, Tingxi Liu, Assefa M Melesse, Wanhong Yang.   

Abstract

Wetlands are one of the most important watershed microtopographic features that affect hydrologic processes (e.g., routing) and the fate and transport of constituents (e.g., sediment and nutrients). Efforts to conserve existing wetlands and/or to restore lost wetlands require that watershed-level effects of wetlands on water quantity and water quality be quantified. Because monitoring approaches are usually cost or logistics prohibitive at watershed scale, distributed watershed models such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), enhanced by the hydrologic equivalent wetland (HEW) concept developed by Wang [Wang, X., Yang, W., Melesse, A.M., 2008. Using hydrologic equivalent wetland concept within SWAT to estimate streamflow in watersheds with numerous wetlands. Trans. ASABE 51 (1), 55-72.], can be a best resort. However, there is a serious lack of information about simulated effects using this kind of integrated modeling approach. The objective of this study was to use the HEW concept in SWAT to assess effects of wetland restoration within the Broughton's Creek watershed located in southwestern Manitoba, and of wetland conservation within the upper portion of the Otter Tail River watershed located in northwestern Minnesota. The results indicated that the HEW concept allows the nonlinear functional relations between watershed processes and wetland characteristics (e.g., size and morphology) to be accurately represented in the models. The loss of the first 10-20% of the wetlands in the Minnesota study area would drastically increase the peak discharge and loadings of sediment, total phosphorus (TP), and total nitrogen (TN). On the other hand, the justifiable reductions of the peak discharge and loadings of sediment, TP, and TN in the Manitoba study area may require that 50-80% of the lost wetlands be restored. Further, the comparison between the predicted restoration and conservation effects revealed that wetland conservation seems to deserve a higher priority while both wetland conservation and restoration may be equally important. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20236754     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  4 in total

1.  HYDROLOGICAL, PHYSICAL, AND CHEMICAL FUNCTIONS AND CONNECTIVITY OF NON-FLOODPLAIN WETLANDS TO DOWNSTREAM WATERS: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Charles R Lane; Scott G Leibowitz; Bradley C Autrey; Stephen D LeDuc; Laurie C Alexander
Journal:  J Am Water Resour Assoc       Date:  2018-03-01

Review 2.  Non-floodplain Wetlands Affect Watershed Nutrient Dynamics: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Heather E Golden; Adnan Rajib; Charles R Lane; Jay R Christensen; Qiusheng Wu; Samson Mengistu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 11.357

3.  Enhancing protection for vulnerable waters.

Authors:  Irena F Creed; Charles R Lane; Jacqueline N Serran; Laurie C Alexander; Nandita B Basu; Aram J K Calhoun; Jay R Christensen; Matthew J Cohen; Christopher Craft; Ellen D'Amico; Edward DeKeyser; Laurie Fowler; Heather E Golden; James W Jawitz; Peter Kalla; L Katherine Kirkman; Megan Lang; Scott G Leibowitz; David B Lewis; John Marton; Daniel L McLaughlin; Hadas Raanan-Kiperwas; Mark C Rains; Kai C Rains; Lora Smith
Journal:  Nat Geosci       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 21.531

4.  Changes in stream peak flow and regulation in Naoli River watershed as a result of wetland loss.

Authors:  Yunlong Yao; Lei Wang; Xianguo Lv; Hongxian Yu; Guofu Li
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-07-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.