BACKGROUND: There is concern that rural residents may be less likely to engage in behaviors to reduce their risk for skin cancer compared with urban residents. OBJECTIVES: First, we sought to determine whether rural residents are less likely to use sunscreen and engage in other skin cancer preventive measures. Second, we sought to determine whether such actions are sufficiently explained by factors known to affect these behaviors or whether such actions are affected by rurality. METHODS: We analyzed the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey, a survey of the noninstitutionalized, adult population performed by the National Cancer Institute. We used logistic regression analysis to adjust for confounding by age, race, income, education, health insurance, smoking, sex, marital status, and region. RESULTS: Compared with urban residents, rural residents were 33% less likely (odds ratio = 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.80) to wear sunscreen when exposed to the sun for more than 1 hour. After adjusting for the above confounding variables, however, rural individuals were just as likely as urban individuals to use sunscreen with sun exposure. LIMITATIONS: Inability to adjust for unmeasured confounding variables, such as occupational sun exposure, is a limitation. CONCLUSION: Rural residents were less likely to use sunscreen. This decreased use of sunscreen, however, was explained by differences in age, race, income, education, and other confounding factors that negatively influence the use of sunscreen. Copyright 2009 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: There is concern that rural residents may be less likely to engage in behaviors to reduce their risk for skin cancer compared with urban residents. OBJECTIVES: First, we sought to determine whether rural residents are less likely to use sunscreen and engage in other skin cancer preventive measures. Second, we sought to determine whether such actions are sufficiently explained by factors known to affect these behaviors or whether such actions are affected by rurality. METHODS: We analyzed the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey, a survey of the noninstitutionalized, adult population performed by the National Cancer Institute. We used logistic regression analysis to adjust for confounding by age, race, income, education, health insurance, smoking, sex, marital status, and region. RESULTS: Compared with urban residents, rural residents were 33% less likely (odds ratio = 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.80) to wear sunscreen when exposed to the sun for more than 1 hour. After adjusting for the above confounding variables, however, rural individuals were just as likely as urban individuals to use sunscreen with sun exposure. LIMITATIONS: Inability to adjust for unmeasured confounding variables, such as occupational sun exposure, is a limitation. CONCLUSION: Rural residents were less likely to use sunscreen. This decreased use of sunscreen, however, was explained by differences in age, race, income, education, and other confounding factors that negatively influence the use of sunscreen. Copyright 2009 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Joseph L Riley; Elizabeth A Pomery; Virginia J Dodd; Keith E Muller; Yi Guo; Henrietta L Logan Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Whitney E Zahnd; Natoshia Askelson; Robin C Vanderpool; Lindsay Stradtman; Jean Edward; Paige E Farris; Victoria Petermann; Jan M Eberth Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Jakob D Jensen; Manusheela Pokharel; Andy J King; Kevin K John; Yelena P Wu; Douglas Grossman Journal: Psychol Health Med Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 2.423
Authors: Kelly D Blake; Jennifer L Moss; Anna Gaysynsky; Shobha Srinivasan; Robert T Croyle Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Kathryn E Weaver; Nynikka Palmer; Lingyi Lu; L Douglas Case; Ann M Geiger Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 2.506