Literature DB >> 20236159

Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics in the USA and in Europe.

Anton C de Groot1, Margo Veenstra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frequencies of sensitization to formaldehyde among US patients patch tested for suspected contact dermatitis are higher than in Europe. Cosmetics are an important source of contact with formaldehyde.
OBJECTIVES: To acquire data on the frequency of use of formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics sold in the USA and Europe and their use concentrations. To assess whether any observed differences may contribute to the discrepancies in sensitization rates.
METHODS: Enquiries with Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Cosmetics Association, and the Dutch Cosmetics Association. Reading the labels of skin care cosmetics in a local drugstore.
RESULTS: The FDA provided data on the presence of formaldehyde and releasers. Nearly one fifth of all cosmetics contain a releaser. In 25% of 496 examined skin care products, releasers were present. In comparable FDA data categories, the percentage was 24. No data were found on use concentrations of the releasers in cosmetics in either the USA or Europe.
CONCLUSIONS: The percentages of stay-on skin care products containing a formaldehyde-releaser are virtually identical in the USA (FDA data) and our local drugstore sample. However, this does not necessarily imply that cosmetics play no part in the differences in formaldehyde sensitization rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20236159     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01623.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  5 in total

1.  Single- and repeated-dose 28-day oral toxicity study of MDM hydantoin in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Hansol Won; Jin Hee Lee; Ji-Hyun Seok; Kikyung Jung; Jun-Young Yang; Jayoung Jeong; Jong Kwon Lee
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2020-08-17

2.  Contact dermatitis associated with preservatives: Retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 1994 through 2016.

Authors:  Amber Reck Atwater; Amy J Petty; Beiyu Liu; Cynthia L Green; Jonathan I Silverberg; Joel G DeKoven; Donald V Belsito; Margo J Reeder; Denis Sasseville; James S Taylor; Howard I Maibach; Matthew J Zirwas; James G Marks; Kathryn A Zug; Joseph F Fowler; Melanie D Pratt; Vincent A DeLeo; Erin M Warshaw
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 15.487

Review 3.  Cosmetics Preservation: A Review on Present Strategies.

Authors:  Noureddine Halla; Isabel P Fernandes; Sandrina A Heleno; Patrícia Costa; Zahia Boucherit-Otmani; Kebir Boucherit; Alírio E Rodrigues; Isabel C F R Ferreira; Maria Filomena Barreiro
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Effects of Several Cosmetic Preservatives on ROS-Dependent Apoptosis of Rat Neural Progenitor Cells.

Authors:  Onjeon Ryu; Bo Kyung Park; Minji Bang; Kyu Suk Cho; Sung Hoon Lee; Edson Luck T Gonzales; Sung Min Yang; Seonmin Kim; Pyeong Hwa Eun; Joo Young Lee; Kyu-Bong Kim; Chan Young Shin; Kyoung Ja Kwon
Journal:  Biomol Ther (Seoul)       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Low-dose formaldehyde delays DNA damage recognition and DNA excision repair in human cells.

Authors:  Andreas Luch; Flurina C Clement Frey; Regula Meier; Jia Fei; Hanspeter Naegeli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.