Literature DB >> 20236104

Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesions.

Y J Blumenfeld1, A B Caughey, Y Y El-Sayed, K Daniels, D J Lyell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between single-layer (one running suture) and double-layer (second layer or imbricating suture) hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and subsequent adhesion formation.
DESIGN: A secondary analysis from a prospective cohort study of women undergoing first repeat caesarean section.
SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. POPULATION: One hundred and twenty-seven pregnant women undergoing first repeat caesarean section.
METHODS: Patient records were reviewed to identify whether primary caesarean hysterotomies were closed with a single or double layer. Data were analysed by Fisher's exact tests and multivariable logistic regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prevalence rate of pelvic and abdominal adhesions.
RESULTS: Of the 127 women, primary hysterotomy closure was single layer in 56 and double layer in 71. Single-layer hysterotomy closure was associated with bladder adhesions at the time of repeat caesarean (24% versus 7%, P = 0.01). Single-layer closure was associated in this study with a seven-fold increase in the odds of developing bladder adhesions (odds ratio, 6.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-28.1), regardless of other surgical techniques, previous labour, infection and age over 35 years. There was no association between single-layer closure and other pelvic or abdominal adhesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary single-layer hysterotomy closure may be associated with more frequent bladder adhesions during repeat caesarean deliveries. The severity and clinical implications of these adhesions should be assessed in large prospective trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20236104     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02529.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  6 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative adhesion development following cesarean and open intra-abdominal gynecological operations: a review.

Authors:  Awoniyi O Awonuga; Nicole M Fletcher; Ghassan M Saed; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 2.  Adhesions after abdominal surgery: a systematic review of the incidence, distribution and severity.

Authors:  Koji Okabayashi; Hutan Ashrafian; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Yuko Kitagawa; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for women with anterior wall adherence after cesarean section.

Authors:  Sue Yeon Park; Jung Hun Lee; Joong Sub Choi; Jaeman Bae; Won Moo Lee; Jung Hwa Ko; A Ra Koh; Seon Hye Park
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Surgical Techniques at Cesarean Delivery: A U.S. Survey.

Authors:  Deirdre J Lyell; Michael Power; Katie Murtough; Amen Ness; Britta Anderson; Kristine Erickson; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2016-11-14

5.  Bladder Injury During Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Christopher M Tarney
Journal:  Curr Womens Health Rev       Date:  2013-05

Review 6.  MRI findings of complications related to previous uterine scars.

Authors:  Leonor Alamo; Yvan Vial; Alban Denys; Gustav Andreisek; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Sabine Schmidt
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2018-01-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.