BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) remains a challenge, and no effective second-line treatment has been identified. In CUP patients who are non-responsive or relapse early after first-line platinum/taxane-based regimens, it is likely that gastrointestinal (GI) tract tumours may be overrepresented. These patients could be candidates for GI tract-directed therapy. We here report the results obtained with oxaliplatin and capecitabine as second-line therapy in 25 recurrent/refractory CUP patients following first-line treatment with paclitaxel, cisplatin and gemcitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received capecitabine orally (1000 mg/m(2)) twice daily, days 1-14, and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)) intravenously on day 1 in a three-week schedule. RESULTS: Twenty-five CUP patients received a median of three cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin as second-line treatment. Histopathological assessments suggested the primary site to be of GI tract origin in the majority of the patients (76%). We found an objective response rate of 13%, a median progression-free survival and overall survival rate of 2.3 and 3.9 months, respectively, and 32% of patients alive at one year after initiation of second-line therapy. The regimen was well tolerated by most patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study, demonstrates that there is still a significant need for improved second-line therapy in CUP patients.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) remains a challenge, and no effective second-line treatment has been identified. In CUP patients who are non-responsive or relapse early after first-line platinum/taxane-based regimens, it is likely that gastrointestinal (GI) tract tumours may be overrepresented. These patients could be candidates for GI tract-directed therapy. We here report the results obtained with oxaliplatin and capecitabine as second-line therapy in 25 recurrent/refractory CUP patients following first-line treatment with paclitaxel, cisplatin and gemcitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received capecitabine orally (1000 mg/m(2)) twice daily, days 1-14, and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)) intravenously on day 1 in a three-week schedule. RESULTS: Twenty-five CUP patients received a median of three cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin as second-line treatment. Histopathological assessments suggested the primary site to be of GI tract origin in the majority of the patients (76%). We found an objective response rate of 13%, a median progression-free survival and overall survival rate of 2.3 and 3.9 months, respectively, and 32% of patients alive at one year after initiation of second-line therapy. The regimen was well tolerated by most patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study, demonstrates that there is still a significant need for improved second-line therapy in CUP patients.
Authors: Kanwal P Raghav; Bettzy Stephen; Daniel D Karp; Sarina A Piha-Paul; David S Hong; Dipti Jain; Dilichukwu O Chudy Onwugaje; Abdulrahman Abonofal; Anneleis F Willett; Michael Overman; Brandon Smaglo; Ryan W Huey; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Gauri R Varadhachary; Aung Naing Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2022-05 Impact factor: 12.469